Re: cgbg, was [computer-go] On average how many board updates/sec can top Go programs do these days?

2008-01-15 Thread David Doshay
Much better!! Cheers, David On 15, Jan 2008, at 3:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: terry mcintyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: www.swcp.com/~wing/cgbg I visited the www page, and the combination of with very long lines does not work well at all. Tried both firefox and IE. prevents the brow

Re: cgbg, was [computer-go] On average how many board updates/sec can top Go programs do these days?

2008-01-15 Thread wing
terry mcintyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > www.swcp.com/~wing/cgbg > > I visited the www page, and the combination of with > very long lines does not work well at all. Tried both firefox > and IE. prevents the browser from wrapping the text to > fit the display page. Thanks. Reformatted the

Re: cgbg, was [computer-go] On average how many board updates/sec can top Go programs do these days?

2008-01-15 Thread terry mcintyre
- Original Message From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: computer-go Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:59:15 PM Subject: cgbg, was [computer-go] On average how many board updates/sec can top Go programs do these days? Gian-Carlo Pascutto <[EMAIL PRO

cgbg, was [computer-go] On average how many board updates/sec can top Go programs do these days?

2008-01-15 Thread wing
Gian-Carlo Pascutto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I wrote my program to track psuedoliberties because this is very fast > and I thought I could take a lot of shortcuts and early exits when I had > to know the real amount of liberties. Unfortunately the interesting > cases seem to be the ones that