ng for bots. I'm asking for my client to connect to your
>>>>> server
>>>>>> so they can play their games using The Many Faces of Go as their go
>>>> board,
>>>>>> not using your web interface. This is available now for IGS, an
?
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: computer-go-boun...@dvandva.org [mailto:computer-go-
boun...@dvandva.org] On Behalf Of Pete Schwamb
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:27 AM
To: computer-go@dvandva.org
Subject: Re: [Computer-go] OS and scoring
On Oct 20, 2010, at 6:04 PM, David Fotland
ks,
>>
>> David
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: computer-go-boun...@dvandva.org [mailto:computer-go-
>>> boun...@dvandva.org] On Behalf Of Pete Schwamb
>>> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 9:13 AM
>>> To: computer-go@dvandva.or
nal Message-
>> From: computer-go-boun...@dvandva.org [mailto:computer-go-
>> boun...@dvandva.org] On Behalf Of Pete Schwamb
>> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 9:13 AM
>> To: computer-go@dvandva.org
>> Subject: Re: [Computer-go] OS and scoring
>>
>> Ah, sorr
-go@dvandva.org
> Subject: Re: [Computer-go] OS and scoring
>
> Ah, sorry for the misread. Yes, the protocol allows all those things, and
I
> would love to have more players. The considerations that come to mind
are:
>
> 1) All the previous caveats about protocol compatibilit
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: computer-go-boun...@dvandva.org [mailto:computer-go-
>> boun...@dvandva.org] On Behalf Of Pete Schwamb
>> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:27 AM
>> To: computer-go@dvandva.org
>> Subject: Re: [C
: computer-go@dvandva.org
> Subject: Re: [Computer-go] OS and scoring
>
> On Oct 20, 2010, at 6:04 PM, David Fotland wrote:
>
> > I do like GoShrines design.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > For testing, I'll continue to use kgs, since it
> > has more players. I would be
On Oct 20, 2010, at 6:04 PM, David Fotland wrote:
> I do like GoShrines design.
Thanks!
> For testing, I'll continue to use kgs, since it
> has more players. I would be interested if you allowed me to build a
> client interface into my commercial program, so people could play directly
> from
s not
allow this.
David
> -Original Message-
> From: computer-go-boun...@dvandva.org [mailto:computer-go-
> boun...@dvandva.org] On Behalf Of Pete Schwamb
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 7:18 AM
> To: computer-go@dvandva.org
> Subject: Re: [Computer-go] OS and scoring
Hurrah!
Pete Schwamb wrote:
... firewall friendliness (no special ports)
I like this alot since I don't always have control over the
configuration of the machines/networks I use (depending on where I am),
but port 80 is always open similarly almost all the machines I've
come across have a
Woops, I see that you already thought of that. I should have read the
emails more carefully.
Don
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Don Dailey wrote:
> It just occurred to me that you could write this in ruby and still make it
> java compatible using jruby.Then users could have a choice.
It just occurred to me that you could write this in ruby and still make it
java compatible using jruby.Then users could have a choice.
Don
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Don Dailey wrote:
> How is Java any different than Ruby? They both require you to install
> their runtime.And Ru
On Oct 19, 2010, at 10:44 PM, David Fotland wrote:
> Why is goshrine better than kgs? I have limited resources to run my bot,
> and I'd prefer to run it on kgs where it gets an accurate rating, I can
> download games, and there are a variety of opponents.
>
> David
I wouldn't claim GoShrine i
On Oct 19, 2010, at 10:40 PM, Michael Williams wrote:
> I think Java would be your best best for this crowd, since that's what
> is required for GoGui and it's associated scripts
> (http://gogui.sourceforge.net/doc/tools.html). And it's also what the
> cgoban KGS client requires.
Thanks for al
How is Java any different than Ruby? They both require you to install
their runtime.And Ruby is just as cross platform, no?
If it's a performance issue Java is much faster than Ruby and would be the
better choice, but not because of installation issues. It's way easier
to develop with R
Pete Schwamb wrote:
>Also, my server currently only support japanese scoring (via gnugo). Is it
>acceptable to have
>gnugo be the judge of the final score, and would your bot support territory
>scoring?
Could we do something if gnugo's judgement was wrong?
--
Yamato
__
Mac OS X 1.6
I will install ruby to try my bot on the new server.
I am more prefer to cgos's score method.
___
Computer-go mailing list
Computer-go@dvandva.org
http://dvandva.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/computer-go
It's a nice, clean web interface. I see that it uses MLRate for
ratings. I wonder how that compares to bayeselo
(http://remi.coulom.free.fr/Bayesian-Elo/). Looks like they are both
based on maximum likelyhood.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Pete Schwamb wrote:
> I'm planning on releasing m
computer-go-
> boun...@dvandva.org] On Behalf Of Pete Schwamb
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 8:29 PM
> To: computer-go@dvandva.org
> Subject: [Computer-go] OS and scoring
>
> I'm planning on releasing my client library for hooking up go bots to
> GoShrine (http://gosh
I think Java would be your best best for this crowd, since that's what
is required for GoGui and it's associated scripts
(http://gogui.sourceforge.net/doc/tools.html). And it's also what the
cgoban KGS client requires.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Pete Schwamb wrote:
> I'm planning on rele
I'm planning on releasing my client library for hooking up go bots to GoShrine
(http://goshrine.com) sometime in the near future, but I'm not sure what
operating system and level of expertise I should be targeting.
It'd be pretty easy for me to release a linux only version that requires ruby,
21 matches
Mail list logo
