Re: [CGUYS] 'Clean Instal' W7 Upgrades Illegal

2009-11-10 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Tony B wrote: > I have no idea what you're talking about, unless you're just being > sarcastic. But I thought I'd point out that an annual re-installation > of the OS hasn't been advisable since the old Win9x days. The whole > WinNT line has always normally been s

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

2009-11-10 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
For people in my sons age group it is perfect. He is a huge transformers nut. Stewart At 11:31 PM 11/9/2009, you wrote: Thanks, I found four commercials for droid but not that one. I can see the michael bay effect strong on that one, not a good thing. On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:26 PM, phartz.

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

2009-11-10 Thread mike
This is exactly like marketing that flowery phone on verizon that looks like a compact to young girls. On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall < revsamarsh...@earthlink.net> wrote: > For people in my sons age group it is perfect. He is a huge transformers > nut. > > Stewart > > >

Re: [CGUYS] 'Clean Instal' W7 Upgrades Illegal

2009-11-10 Thread Tony B
By the time you talk biannually then at that point there would also be hardware issues like new motherboards to prompt a clean install. Note that my workstations, not connected to the internet, or subject to constant program installs, will run as fresh in a few years when it's replaced as it did on

Re: [CGUYS] 'Clean Instal' W7 Upgrades Illegal

2009-11-10 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Tony B wrote: Whoops I meant semi-annually. It's like a spring cleaning. I treat computers like cars run until dead. I still have an HP running as my main PC from five or six years ago. It mostly runs what I need it to fine except for iTunes which sucks all t

Re: [CGUYS] 'Clean Instal' W7 Upgrades Illegal

2009-11-10 Thread mike
Can't be that old, we are told constantly by the mac glitterati that pc's don't last that long. You must mean five or six months :p On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Tony B wrote: > > Whoops I meant semi-annually. It's like a spring cl

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

2009-11-10 Thread tjpa
On Nov 9, 2009, at 11:26 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ_sOAhoc0o Interesting. iPhone ads are all about what the phone can do. Droid ads are all about everything and anything else. * **

Re: [CGUYS] 'Clean Instal' W7 Upgrades Illegal

2009-11-10 Thread tjpa
On Nov 10, 2009, at 8:25 AM, John Duncan Yoyo wrote: I keep hearing that advice as a method to make sure you have a virus free environment. Windows may be stable enough to run but it isn't secure enough to run for years. I tend to reinstall biannually due to the system degradation. Not s

Re: [CGUYS] Windows Mail and Yahoo

2009-11-10 Thread tjpa
On Nov 9, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Rosenberg, Alan [USA] wrote: Running Vista HP with Windows Mail, had a situation where my message to a friend with a Yahoo domain email address was never delivered, and a message from him to me (requested by phone) also never arrived. I've used Verizon as my mail

[CGUYS] IPv4 Exhaustion Counter

2009-11-10 Thread tjpa
http://inetcore.com/project/ipv4ec/index_en.html The available supply of IPv4 Internet addresses for the United States, Canada and Atlantic region is expected to be exhausted within the next two years. * ** List info,

Re: [CGUYS] IPv4 Exhaustion Counter

2009-11-10 Thread Ellen Rains Harris
So does this mean I'm going to have to learn something about IPv6 or can we just steal some v4 from the less fortunate? - Original Message - From: "tjpa" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 9:33 PM Subject: [CGUYS] IPv4 Exhaustion Counter http://inetcore.com/project/ipv4ec/index

Re: [CGUYS] droid self-photography?

2009-11-10 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:20 PM, tjpa wrote: > Interesting. iPhone ads are all about what the phone can do. Droid ads are > all about everything and anything else. I noted the obvious imagery of collusion between Motorola, Verizon, Google and the Pentagon as they collectively launch an attack