FUD has nothing to do with it. You simply think Google is lying and others
think Apple is. Looking at who has a reason to lie, it's not hard to take
google's side in this. Apple's only defense has been we didn't really deny
google voice after we denied it.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:54 PM,
On Oct 9, 2009, at 2:06 AM, mike wrote:
FUD has nothing to do with it. You simply think Google is lying and others
think Apple is. Looking at who has a reason to lie, it's not hard to take
google's side in this. Apple's only defense has been we didn't really deny
google voice after we
So what's the deal with ATT's decision to allow cellular VOIP?
It's a great thing... should allow minimal cell minutes usage, cheap
long distance and reverse the recent decision re: Google Voice on the
iPhone.
Anybody know the back story on why ATT did that?
It seems counter-intuitive to
I can only guess the FCC and their push for Net Neutrality even
within the Cell phone area.
Stewart
At 02:33 PM 10/8/2009, you wrote:
So what's the deal with ATT's decision to allow cellular VOIP?
It's a great thing... should allow minimal cell minutes usage, cheap
long distance and
Any likelihood that it was consumer backlash?
Fred Holmes
At 03:33 PM 10/8/2009, db wrote:
So what's the deal with ATT's decision to allow cellular VOIP?
It's a great thing... should allow minimal cell minutes usage, cheap long
distance and reverse the recent decision re: Google Voice on the
Fred Holmes wrote:
Any likelihood that it was consumer backlash?
Fred Holmes
Hah! When has that ever happened? Precious seldom me thinks.
Corps have personage without liability. People have personage with
liability...
Normally, corps more or less do what they want and we take what
Several articles have read that it was under pressure from the FCC. Apple's
lying about the google app doesn't help.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM, db db...@att.net wrote:
Fred Holmes wrote:
Any likelihood that it was consumer backlash?
Fred Holmes
Hah! When has that ever happened?
Any likelihood that it was consumer backlash?
More like world phone envy, or at least T-Mobile envy. T-Mobile has been
selling WiFi phones for a year or so. They're popular, like the ones
from HTC. Only problem, they were originally crippled so that they only
worked with T-M WiFi.
WiFi