On Jun 7, 2008, at 1:58 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:
Is it important that the Nokia N-series phones' cameras have Zeiss
lenses? Does that make their photos any better?
Maybe. But, compared to what? If compared to an identical phone
equipped with a different lens make, perhaps it will be better.
>Is it important that the Nokia N-series phones' cameras have Zeiss
>lenses? Does that make their photos any better? Of course, they're still
>mobile phones, not dedicated cameras.
Or did Zeiss get new managers who will sell Zeiss stickers to just about
anybody? I don't know what's going on ins
Most people don't realize how the quality of glass is so important in
photography. I worked for a newspaper, in the art department, and
shooting/developing/printing film, shooting photostats. If I was lucky,
they'd be printed in the glossy section instead of on newsprint.
One day one of the re
On Jun 6, 2008, at 3:53 PM, chad evans wyatt wrote:
Should you elect to go the DSLR route, you will learn there also
that your most important investment is in glass, not in ephemeral
camera.
So, so true. A good lens on a consumer level DSLR provides for a
better image than mediocre g
Please.
The D40 new is superior to a refurbished or new D70 (or D70s). The Nikon
18~55mmVR lens is excellent. A DSLR one buys today is overtaken swiftly by
next models, certainly within 18 months. A film-era camera, such as Hasselblad
(I use them even now with great reliability), was viabl
