Do it yourself since you changed it...please!
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:06 AM, tjpa wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 9:38 AM, mike wrote:
>
>> Funny how it was credible when they were blasting Bush...but then when he
>> does things it's bad...obama good...bush bad..
>>
>
> HEY! Change the subject li
Every new president inherits policies with which he disagrees,
especially when it is a party change. W complained about inheriting a
recession which started in the latter year of the Clinton admin. W also
inherited a national security structure which was inadequate to prevent
9/1, but didn't wh
On Dec 11, 2009, at 9:38 AM, mike wrote:
Funny how it was credible when they were blasting Bush...but then
when he
does things it's bad...obama good...bush bad..
HEY! Change the subject line and add an "OT" tag please!
Although I completely agree with the initial analysis, and would like
that the latter part could be true, that deduction is totally divorced
from any possible reality in my opinion.
What is it we are trying to ... hoping to correct? How does one correct
Afghanistan? What does correcting Afgh
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:38 AM, mike wrote:
> Funny how it was credible when they were blasting Bush...but then when he
> does things it's bad...obama good...bush bad..
>
> The problem is Obama got stuck with a bunch of bad Bush policy and has to
figure out how to unravel the mess without leavin
Funny how it was credible when they were blasting Bush...but then when he
does things it's bad...obama good...bush bad..
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Jeff Miles wrote:
>Oh give me a break. You find this credible? Check into the group
> first. I could more then likely post Rush junk
Oh give me a break. You find this credible? Check into the group
first. I could more then likely post Rush junk more worthy of looking
at then this.
Jeff Miles
jmile...@charter.net
Join my Mafia
http://apps.facebook.com/inthemafia/status_invite.php?from=550968726
On Dec 5, 2009, at 9:07
Didn't you know, Oprah has long been a member of the NSA. Most of her
shows were a guise for tracking persons.
"You get a free car! And you get a free car!" Who doesn't think these
cars weren't equipped with state of the art GPS as well as having
every serial number under the sun that was i
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Fred Holmes wrote:
> Who would you rather have tracking every IP address you visit? OpenDNS?
> Google?
>
> Certainly not your ISP, they are much lower on anyone's list.
> When I first read the subject line, I was hoping that "free" modified
> "Google" as in Go
That's implied in the powers enumerated in the health care bill. They wouldn't
be explicit about it.
At 11:19 AM 12/5/2009, tjpa wrote:
>Where were all these far-right paranoiac conspiracy theories when the
>Bushies were building their vast infrastructure to track everything
>anyone did on t
This boys and girls is what is called a 'hypocrite'. To note, yes they were
defending the previous admins actions, with newly appointed lawyers for the
new admin. Using the same argument. But to Tom this is ok because O has a
big D after his name therefore the exact same actions are 'good' that
On Dec 5, 2009, at 12:07 PM, mike wrote:
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/obama-doj-worse-than-bush
If this case was being tried in April then it would have been
defending actions of the previous administration and probably being
defended by a legal team assembled by the previous admini
Don't believe what?
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/obama-doj-worse-than-bush
It's not about 'believing' it's about not being close minded. Bush and
Obama are more alike than anyone on either side care to admit. All O has
done is remove the brake pedal completely.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:36 AM, mike wrote:
> Where are you now that the big O is expanding it? You whined about Bush
> and
> in your hypocrisy that's stopped as soon as your guy took over.
>
> Is it any coincidence that Oprah announces she is quitting after she
interviews another infamous quit
On Dec 5, 2009, at 11:36 AM, mike wrote:
Where are you now that the big O is expanding it?
What did Oprah do? I don't believe it. References please? And no links
to Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, Rush. Fox, Moonies, or the WSJ please.
*
Where are you now that the big O is expanding it? You whined about Bush and
in your hypocrisy that's stopped as soon as your guy took over.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, tjpa wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Fred Holmes wrote:
>
>> When I first read the subject line, I was hoping that "f
On Dec 5, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Fred Holmes wrote:
When I first read the subject line, I was hoping that "free"
modified "Google" as in Google doesn't have its hooks into this.
Google is a Democrat conspiracy to track everything anyone does on
the Net.
Where were all these far-right paranoia
On Dec 5, 2009, at 12:01 AM, Tony B wrote:
I've used OpenDNS for so long I almost missed this. But Google now
offers a free DNS that's much easier to remember (8.8.8.8., 8.8.4.4)!
DynDNS started offering this recently too.
I tried and stopped using DynDNS because I thought they were too
aggr
Who would you rather have tracking every IP address you visit? OpenDNS?
Google?
There are no secrets in your Internet activity (without using some serious
anonymity techniques, that most people won't or can't).
When I first read the subject line, I was hoping that "free" modified "Google"
as
I've used OpenDNS for so long I almost missed this. But Google now
offers a free DNS that's much easier to remember (8.8.8.8., 8.8.4.4)!
http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/
Quick - somebody else try it first!
*
** List
20 matches
Mail list logo
