Actually, this is a benefit offered by most domain companies for years:
http://www.networksolutions.com/domain-name-registration/private.jsp
as just one example.
/gayley
On Aug 30, 2008, at 10:51 PM, Tony B wrote:
Please note. He did not say his hosting was with Godaddy, only the
name regist
Please note. He did not say his hosting was with Godaddy, only the
name registration. I'm not sure anyone else - bluehost included -
actually offers 'private' domain info? Honestly, I'd never heard of it
before this thread.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:16 PM, GK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree
I agree with the general consensus at this point that it is not
necessary to go the private route. I also agree with Tom that you can
do better than godaddy. I suggest looking at bluehost.com --
regardless, you'll have to pay for privacy and it is not, imo, of much
value.
/gayley knight
It depends what he's doing, and just how 'secret' he wants his info to
remain. Personally, I wouldn't bother, but I can imagine it might be
worth it to some people.
But make him aware that, when faced with a subpoena, or even a
strongly worded letter from an attorney, they _will_ cave. For $9 a
ye
Newbie at making a web site (better said: at creating a new domain name
& web hosting) has registered a domain name (godaddy) and paid for web
hosting (3essentials). Godaddy wants me to pay an additional $9 per
year to them for privacy for the domain name.
Is it worth it?
*
