the mall is one of the showplaces of the estates united. the mall has been an
embarrassment for the past couple of years. no reason to maintain the mall,
the whitehouse or lawn the capitol grounds, ect, as the usa has been a
tremendous embarrassment to itself for quite a number of years.
There's bound to be a train wreck, whenever the switchover occurs. As
someone who has always received his TV with a rooftop antenna, and who
has an eleven year old analog set ($200 at Belmont-TV - which still
delivers a beautiful picture), I have already made the conversion.
The process would be
PBS, no favorite of the neocons, stood to lose $22M with a delay.
The legislation did not require the stations to not switch. It merely
relaxed the requirement that they do switch. If the station did not care
about its audience it was free to switch at anytime. The law also
allocated funds to
the mall, was Re: [CGUYS] Senate Approves Digital TV
Delay
I disagree.
I visited the mall this summer, and it needed to be resodded then. It's not
a worthwhile expenditure for Congress, but worthwhile for the tourist
industry and provides jobs.
Resodding the mall (wrecked by the wonderful
House voted it down. No delay.
Stewart
At 09:08 AM 1/27/2009, you wrote:
Senate Approves Digital TV Delay
Article Tools Sponsored By
By BLOOMBERG NEWS
Published: January 26, 2009
The Senate voted on Monday to delay next month's transition to
digital television until June 12 because some
For the details, see
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087sid=a8bM7KXlSCUgrefer=home#
Mike
Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
House voted it down. No delay.
Stewart
At 09:08 AM 1/27/2009, you wrote:
Senate Approves Digital TV Delay
House voted it down. No delay.
The neocons are on a tear. They are probably pissed off that Citi was
stopped from spending $50,000,000 on a new airplane toy. So no TV for the
poor and no grass for the Washington Mall.
PBS, no favorite of the neocons, stood to lose $22M with a delay.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jEqzyZfGUgUWJQfcJ98kJK_LiiOwD95V41187
and if the poor couldn't get their act together in 12 months, it's
unlikely they will in another 4.
Resodding the mall (wrecked by the
But house didn't !!
-Original Message-
From: Mike Sloane [mailto:mikeslo...@verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: Senate Approves Digital TV Delay
For the details, see
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087sid=a8bM7KXlSCUgrefer=home
#
Mike
Rev.
There's probably a better solution than a delay. Maybe just allow the
coupons to be used for reimbursement *after* a purchase.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness,
I disagree.
I visited the mall this summer, and it needed to be resodded then. It's not a
worthwhile expenditure for Congress, but worthwhile for the tourist industry
and provides jobs.
Resodding the mall (wrecked by the wonderful outpouring of
support for the inauguration) may well be a
Senate Approves Digital TV Delay
Article Tools Sponsored By
By BLOOMBERG NEWS
Published: January 26, 2009
The Senate voted on Monday to delay next month’s transition to digital
television until June 12 because some viewers would not be ready for the
switch.
The voice vote followed a call
Yes, but that's about all they did - vote to postpone. They didn't
address the sticky issue of more money for free converter boxes. Worse
than useless.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Mike Sloane mikeslo...@verizon.net wrote:
Senate Approves Digital TV Delay
Right, they spent the rest of the day twiddling their thumbs.
Tony B wrote:
Yes, but that's about all they did - vote to postpone. They didn't
address the sticky issue of more money for free converter boxes. Worse
than useless.
Well at least they did not spend any more money!!! :-)
I heard someone on Radio today railing about the ethical culture of
Wall Street. Well it ain't much better in DC.
Yes we all know that Stewart and his neighbors, clinging to their guns
and religion, hold the monopoly on righteousness.
I will only admit to the middle one. I own no firearms (unless you
count a pellet gun as one) and I am far from righteous.
I got peaved a little the other day when I saw a news network
interview Vitter from LA. as a republican representative to talk
about their negotiations with Obama.
Tom Piwowar wrote:
Yes we all know that Stewart and his neighbors, clinging to their guns
and religion, hold the monopoly on righteousness.
No, No! Those people are my neighbors here in PA.
*
** List info,
Oh you are one of Murtha's
Stewart
At 06:35 PM 1/27/2009, you wrote:
Tom Piwowar wrote:
Yes we all know that Stewart and his neighbors, clinging to their
guns and religion, hold the monopoly on righteousness.
No, No! Those people are my neighbors here in PA.
Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
I got peaved a little the other day when I saw a news network
interview Vitter from LA. as a republican representative to talk
about their negotiations with Obama.
Was that accurate reporting or spin designed to get you riled?
Today I heard one Republican Senator exclaiming that the proposed
This is the guy who was mentioned in the Madame's little black book last
year.
You are not supposed to remember what happened last year! Nobody else
does. My Congressman beat his wife, but nobody remembers that either.
*
I know that is a problem am trying to overcome. I have a good memory.
Stewart
At 08:37 PM 1/27/2009, you wrote:
This is the guy who was mentioned in the Madame's little black book last
year.
You are not supposed to remember what happened last year! Nobody else
does. My Congressman beat his
Who is your Congressman? Story sounds so familiar.
Ted Haggard to tell all on Oprah tomorrow, but he wasn't a politician.
Randall
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Tom Piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:
This is the guy who was mentioned in the Madame's little black book last
year.
You are not
22 matches
Mail list logo
