For years, computer makers and makers of products that interface
with computers such as flash drives and hard drives have worked hard
and long to increase the speeds at which their products perform their
functions. Consumers have seen data transfer rate speeds greatly
increase, and those speed i
Where are you getting this? I haven't seen anything about this.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:43 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
> For years, computer makers and makers of products that interface
> with computers such as flash drives and hard drives have worked hard
> and long to increase the speeds
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:09 AM, mike wrote:
> Where are you getting this? I haven't seen anything about this.
This has been talked about for years. Right here, for a recent example:
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2010/01/18/wifi-direct-wireless-ces.html
We are already seeing a numbe
I had just never heard anyone saying they wanted to give up their esata HD
for a wireless one. Just last weekend I helped a friend run 3 cat 5 cables
throughout his house...not sure wired is really going anywhere. I have a
hard enough time dealing with my USB2 drives.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:03
Where are you getting this? I haven't seen anything about this.
This has been talked about for years. Right here, for a recent example:
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2010/01/18/wifi-direct-wireless-ces.html
We are already seeing a number of wireless printers, wireless hard
drives, w
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:14 AM, mike wrote:
> I had just never heard anyone saying they wanted to give up their esata HD
> for a wireless one. Just last weekend I helped a friend run 3 cat 5 cables
> throughout his house...not sure wired is really going anywhere. I have a
> hard enough time de
On Feb 2, 2010, at 9:43 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
But wait! Other than tapping keys on a keyboard, isn't wireless
just about the slowest means of data transfer out there? What about
this speed thing? Where has that suddenly gone?
Or maybe you are just not keeping up with technology...
h
N is pretty good. U upgraded my wireless router/access points to N
this past year. (not that expensive) and put a N card in my one laptop.
I have a mix at home of G and N laptops.
So far it seems to work very well. However the direct connect
(cable) still seems a it faster for big stuff.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:20 PM, tjpa wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2010, at 9:43 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> But wait! Other than tapping keys on a keyboard, isn't wireless
>> just about the slowest means of data transfer out there? What about
>> this speed thing? Where has that suddenly gone?
>
Most potable devices are still using G for their wireless
connection. Part of the reason for this, is N took such a long time
in coming out, many did not want to install a preN device and then
not have it be compatible.
Almost all smartphones with built in Wifi also still use G.
I had to ins
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:50 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
> Actually, and I assumed you would understand this, I was speaking of
> computer technology that is currently in general use. I think that
> almost all current computer users would have to buy new equipment,
> even new computers, to be
On Feb 2, 2010, at 3:54 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Answering myself here, the iPad is configured for "n."
Of course it has "n". That you would even raise the question shows you
don't know Apple.
*
** List info, su
No as I am not sure the Ipod Touch even has N yet. I think it maxes
out at G. As most portable devices are right now.
Stewart
At 06:42 PM 2/3/2010, you wrote:
On Feb 2, 2010, at 3:54 PM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
Answering myself here, the iPad is configured for "n."
Of course it has "n"
So that the government can snoop more easily?
Fred Holmes
At 09:43 AM 2/2/2010, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
>Why would we want to go from megabits to nanobits per
>second, in a comparative sense, along with lost packets and lots of
>RFI for everyone, everywhere? I can think of but two reasons at t
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Fred Holmes wrote:
> So that the government can snoop more easily?
Actually, quite possibly. The government snoops have been
absolutely thrilled about our penchant for cell phones and for exactly
that reason. The national security state is being cemented into
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:42 PM, tjpa wrote:
> Of course it has "n". That you would even raise the question shows you don't
> know Apple.
Sigh. I already answered this anyway. Your post here is redundant,
but it did give you a chance to snark.
Steve
**
16 matches
Mail list logo
