I don't use IE for much the same reason I don't use safari or chrome...I
need the added search plug ins. I'm not too hot on the interface either,
but that may be just not being used to it.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Chrome does this too...does safari on mac?
>
> I'll
>Chrome does this too...does safari on mac?
I'll give Chrome more attention. So far Chrome has been too bare bones
for me. I was using Chrome for Google Apps and was impressed by its
speed. Then I discovered many usefil shortcuts, which worked fine in
FireFox, did not work in Chrome. Quite iron
Chrome does this too...does safari on mac?
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:
> > I saw that and I do like to have lots of tabs open, but my experience
> > with FireFox (and other browsers) is that they run slower and slower as
> > more tabs are open. So I often run with severa
> I saw that and I do like to have lots of tabs open, but my experience
> with FireFox (and other browsers) is that they run slower and slower as
> more tabs are open. So I often run with several browsers to divide my
> open tabs among them. This seems to avoid slowdowns.
>
> Is this just me or ar
>Tree Style Tabs. This does just what it says, puts your tabs on the side in
>the tree format. For those with tons of tabs open in firefox, this makes
>them much easier to find and hit. Great little extension.
I saw that and I do like to have lots of tabs open, but my experience
with FireFox (
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5890
Tree Style Tabs. This does just what it says, puts your tabs on the side in
the tree format. For those with tons of tabs open in firefox, this makes
them much easier to find and hit. Great little extension.
**
