I've been trying to get some basic tests working under Junit. Unfortunately,
I've run into a Derby problem which prevents these tests from working.
What happens is this. Derby, when it creates a database, forces a number of
directories within the database to read-only. Unfortunately, unless
On 6/8/10 6:35 AM, karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
I've been trying to get some basic tests working under Junit. Unfortunately,
I've run into a Derby problem which prevents these tests from working.
What happens is this. Derby, when it creates a database, forces a number of directories
within
(10/06/08 22:35), karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
I've been trying to get some basic tests working under Junit. Unfortunately,
I've run into a Derby problem which prevents these tests from working.
What happens is this. Derby, when it creates a database, forces a number of directories
within
Huh. I wonder how ant is doing it?
Using the ant task directly makes it impossible to do this from within JUnit,
of course, but maybe the same hack can be done inside the test stuff.
Karl
-Original Message-
From: ext Koji Sekiguchi [mailto:k...@r.email.ne.jp]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08,
Yeah, I was pretty surprised too. But on windows it is likely that
File.makeReadOnly() (which is what Derby must be using) doesn't actually do
anything to directories, which would explain the discrepancy.
Karl
-Original Message-
From: ext Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
(10/06/08 23:14), karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
Yeah, I was pretty surprised too. But on windows it is likely that
File.makeReadOnly() (which is what Derby must be using) doesn't actually do
anything to directories, which would explain the discrepancy.
Karl
If so, luckily Ant hack can
I just had a look at the sources. Ant's chmod task queries what kind of OS it
is, and if it is the right kind, it actually attempts to fire off the chmod
utility. ;-)
That's pretty hacky. Nice to avoid that if possible.
Now, I was able to get my current set of brain-dead tests to work OK
If we need to require Java 1.6, that is probably okay. I am fine with that.
Does anybody have a serious objection to requiring Java 1.6 for LCF?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 6:35 AM
To:
