[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13065744#comment-13065744
]
Tobias Rübner commented on CONNECTORS-223:
--
The structure looks good, but the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13065748#comment-13065748
]
Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-223:
Please go ahead, and attach the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13065780#comment-13065780
]
Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-223:
Renaming the tests should not be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13065853#comment-13065853
]
Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-223:
r1147086. Let me know if there's
Has there been any further progress/issues here?
Karl
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Rather than change the database contract, which would have
far-reaching effects, is there any way to simply implement
getTableSchema to work properly with the
Ok- It seems like a good way forward is to assume usage of the maven
plugin within Eclipse. I think this is a reasonable way to do it and
will also keep us honest about being maven-agnostic. I entered a
comment accordingly in the ticket.
Karl
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Farzad Valad
