Re: "Lucene" connector questions

2010-03-03 Thread Karl Wright
Grant Ingersoll wrote: A bigger question is, should LCF be responsible for this stuff or should Solr, etc. be responsible for it? For instance, perhaps all Solr needs is to implement a DataImportHandler processor? Doesn't Solr also handle document conversions, pipeline, etc.? Karl On Mar

Re: "Lucene" connector questions

2010-03-03 Thread Grant Ingersoll
A bigger question is, should LCF be responsible for this stuff or should Solr, etc. be responsible for it? For instance, perhaps all Solr needs is to implement a DataImportHandler processor? On Mar 3, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Erik Hatcher wrote: >> I'm curious why the LuceneConn

Re: "Lucene" connector questions

2010-03-03 Thread Karl Wright
Erik Hatcher wrote: I'm curious why the LuceneConnector doesn't use the SolrJ API? Instead, there's a custom HttpPoster class that does a lot of work that SolrJ already handles internally. Also, this probably should be called a SolrConnector instead, eh? Since it's writing to Solr, not to L

"Lucene" connector questions

2010-03-03 Thread Erik Hatcher
I'm curious why the LuceneConnector doesn't use the SolrJ API? Instead, there's a custom HttpPoster class that does a lot of work that SolrJ already handles internally. Also, this probably should be called a SolrConnector instead, eh? Since it's writing to Solr, not to Lucene directly.