Although it hasn't been the quite required 3 days, this vote isn't
binding anyway, so I'm going to declare it closed and commit the code.
Karl
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Please have a look at CONNECTORS-203 and vote +1 if you think it's
> time to move beyond Java 1.4 a
+1. I have missed Java generics when I have worked with the MCF code, so
this sounds great. I think the connector factories also can be
simplified by using generics, especially when I'm thinking about
CONNECTORS-180.
Erlend
On 31.05.11 01.32, Karl Wright wrote:
Please have a look at CONNEC
+1 (already voted on the issue)
Tommaso
2011/5/31 Koji Sekiguchi
> +1. Let's adopt 1.5 before we go TLP.
>
> koji
> --
> http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
>
>
> (11/05/31 8:32), Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> Please have a look at CONNECTORS-203 and vote +1 if you think it's
>> time to move beyond Java 1.4 a
+1. Let's adopt 1.5 before we go TLP.
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/05/31 8:32), Karl Wright wrote:
Please have a look at CONNECTORS-203 and vote +1 if you think it's
time to move beyond Java 1.4 at the source level, to Java 1.5. I did
some work on this over the weekend and managed t
Please have a look at CONNECTORS-203 and vote +1 if you think it's
time to move beyond Java 1.4 at the source level, to Java 1.5. I did
some work on this over the weekend and managed to convince myself that
a migration to a newer Java version will have no obvious ill effects.
But I'd like your tho
