[jira] [Commented] (CONNECTORS-60) Agent process should be started automatically

2011-08-12 Thread Karl Wright (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13084067#comment-13084067 ] Karl Wright commented on CONNECTORS-60: --- The Quick Start definitely meets the

[jira] Commented: (CONNECTORS-60) Agent process should be started automatically

2010-07-13 Thread Jack Krupansky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888000#action_12888000 ] Jack Krupansky commented on CONNECTORS-60: -- Unless I am mistaken, the jetty

RE: [jira] Commented: (CONNECTORS-60) Agent process should be started automatically

2010-07-13 Thread karl.wright
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (CONNECTORS-60) Agent process should be started automatically [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888000#action_12888000 ] Jack

RE: [jira] Commented: (CONNECTORS-60) Agent process should be started automatically

2010-07-13 Thread karl.wright
So all you want to see is a postgresql version of QuickStart? That's actually trivial - it's a one-line modification to the properties.xml file. My suggestion is to simply address this with documentation.

Re: [jira] Commented: (CONNECTORS-60) Agent process should be started automatically

2010-07-13 Thread Jack Krupansky
: karl.wri...@nokia.com Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:09 PM To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (CONNECTORS-60) Agent process should be started automatically So all you want to see is a postgresql version of QuickStart? That's actually trivial - it's a one-line

RE: [jira] Commented: (CONNECTORS-60) Agent process should be started automatically

2010-07-13 Thread karl.wright
That would help. Keep in mind the Jira issue for bundling the database server as well. I have neither the time nor the inclination to tackle the postgresql bundling proposal. You are on your own there. If you believe that LCF 1.0 cannot be released without such a canned installation