Dear ManifoldCF Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 16 March 2011, 10 am Pacific. The
report
for your
0.2 makes sense.
I think we need to figure out how to attract more contribution. It may have
been a mistake to have separate user and dev lists at this point in the game.
We need users to also be contributors.
-Grant
On Feb 20, 2011, at 9:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
A lot of fairly
I've been pulling users in to extract contributions from them as best
I can. This has generally been effective; success rate is about 3 out
of 4. But it's a pull process, from people who don't usually
contribute to open source.
Karl
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Grant Ingersoll
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I think we need to brainstorm around this board report a bit more, especially
the steps for graduation:
We definitely need more active committers. It's basically Karl at this point
and Robert, Simon and I jump in
Also, would LucidImagination be willing to put up a blurb for the book
on its site?
Karl
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I think we need to brainstorm around this board report a
On Mar 1, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Karl, what do you think we can do to make it easier for people to get into
the code? Are other people putting up patches?
What's been happening is that we do indeed get code from contributors,
but the contributors in question seem like
+1 for collapsing, provided we can merge the existing subscription
lists. If we can't do that, than I'm not in favor.
Karl
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Mar 1, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Karl, what do you think we can do to make it
We should document on the wiki the steps for contributing patches, like we do
for Lucene, et. al. This generally helps and gives us something to point
people to in the future. Also, if we get a few patches from one or two
people on a regular basis, we should look to add them as
