Hi Karl,
Just a question, I read all the warnings about how dependent LCF is on
postgres, but how much of this is really only about performance?
When I look at the code it seems like there is enough abstraction you
could add support for say, hsqldb or similar, even if its only for
testing
an end-to-end test would be the best, though. But something is
better than nothing.
Karl
-Original Message-
From: ext Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 3:43 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Basic core testing infrastructure
Hi
: Re: Basic core testing infrastructure
Hi Karl,
Just a question, I read all the warnings about how dependent LCF is on
postgres, but how much of this is really only about performance?
When I look at the code it seems like there is enough abstraction you
could add support for say, hsqldb
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:54 PM, karl.wri...@nokia.com wrote:
Obviously an end-to-end test would be the best, though. But something is
better than nothing.
Karl
I agree with this, but I think for unit tests, its best to have a very
simple new clean world for each test.
I think testing
-Original Message-
From: ext Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 4:03 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Basic core testing infrastructure
I have to admit I don't know much about the connectors but this sounds
like
I agree with this, but I think for unit tests, its best to have a very
simple new clean world for each test.
I think testing the postgres integration is not really unit tests at
all but something else, and we could make it a separate test module.
I have no problem with supporting both some
