From: Chengyi Zhao
Sometimes users need create the hidden Wi-Fi Access Point
Signed-off-by: Chengyi Zhao
---
doc/technology-api.txt |5 +
gsupplicant/gsupplicant.h |7 +++
gsupplicant/supplicant.c |4
include/technology.h |3 ++-
plugins/bluetooth.c
The current situation is that a failed timeserver name resolution removes
the timeserver immediately from the list of used timeservers and a failure
to connect to the nameserver IP address will remove the timeserver after a
2 second delay. Currently no mechanism exists to re-create the list of
name
From: Chengyi Zhao
Sometimes users need create the hidden Wi-Fi Access Point.
Because wpa_supplicant 2.0 has already added this hidden DBus interface
(the code "int ignore_broadcast_ssid;" of the file config_ssid.h, etc),
it is recommended to use wpa_supplicant 2.0 or later.
Signed-off-by: Chen
Hi,
I'm not sure we want the capability of hiding the SSID when tethering,
let's figure out that one as well.
Just about the patch:
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 18:39 +0800, Chengyi Zhao wrote:
> From: Chengyi Zhao
>
> Sometimes users need create the hidden Wi-Fi Access Point.
>
> Because w
Hi,
On 21.05.2013 13:39, Chengyi Zhao wrote:
From: Chengyi Zhao
Sometimes users need create the hidden Wi-Fi Access Point.
Because wpa_supplicant 2.0 has already added this hidden DBus interface
(the code "int ignore_broadcast_ssid;" of the file config_ssid.h, etc),
it is recommended to use w
Hi Patrik,
> I'm not sure we want the capability of hiding the SSID when tethering,
> let's figure out that one as well.
I do not think this is a good idea in the first place. Hidden SSID is the most
stupid concept invented. It does not provide any extra security. Especially not
if you have act
From: Daniel Wagner
---
src/session.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/session.c b/src/session.c
index db5eb2a..b0dca62 100644
--- a/src/session.c
+++ b/src/session.c
@@ -231,6 +231,7 @@ static char *service2bearer(enum connman_service_type type)
case CONNMAN_SERVI
Hi Patrick,
> I do not think this is a good idea in the first place. Hidden SSID is the
> most stupid concept invented. It does not provide any extra security.
> Especially not if you have actual clients connected. The SSID will be
> resolved eventually if you do an air trace. And if you do not
Hello.
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 17:17, Chengyi Zhao wrote:
> From: Chengyi Zhao
>
> Sometimes users need create the hidden Wi-Fi Access Point
Can you be more specific then sometimes users need this? I see no
valid reason for a user setting up a "hidden" AP for tethering.
Everytime I read this op
IdleTimeout hasn't so far been implemented in any release and will be
handled by other means if needed.
---
doc/technology-api.txt |8
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/technology-api.txt b/doc/technology-api.txt
index 92886e1..81adcbc 100644
--- a/doc/technology-api.tx
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:07 +0300, Patrik Flykt wrote:
> IdleTimeout hasn't so far been implemented in any release and will be
> handled by other means if needed.
Applied, documentation is now fixed.
Patrik
___
connman mailing list
connman@conn
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 18:19, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 17:17, Chengyi Zhao wrote:
> > From: Chengyi Zhao
> >
> > Sometimes users need create the hidden Wi-Fi Access Point
>
>
> Can you be more specific then sometimes users need this? I see no
> valid reason for a
git://w1.fi/srv/git/hostap.git
commit e62f4ed0df72987f874b9bc5c9fa8bec938133ac
Author: Vivek Natarajan
Date: Mon Feb 27 16:28:45 2012 +0200
Add support for hidden SSID in wpa_supplicant AP mode
This also disables WPS support if hidden SSID is enabled in AP mode.
Signed-off-by: Vi
Hi Marcel,
Hi Patrik,
>
> > I'm not sure we want the capability of hiding the SSID when tethering,
> > let's figure out that one as well.
>
> I do not think this is a good idea in the first place. Hidden SSID is the
> most stupid concept invented. It does not provide any extra security.
> Especial
Hi,
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:17 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Reading through the whole connman folder would have saved me from
> sending this. At least others are feeling the same way. :)
It is much better that people raise the concerns they have than keep
silent, even if they share t
Hi,
I indeed noticed that code earlier. Unfortunately that commit does not
add support for passing the variable via dbus. So some additional
patches are required for dbus support.
Cheers,
Jukka
On 22.05.2013 03:42, Chengyi Zhao wrote:
git://w1.fi/srv/git/hostap.git
commit e62f4ed0df72987f
From: Daniel Wagner
When a new session is created we need to get the initial list
of services which match the session AllowedBearers criteria. As soon
the session is running add or removed services are tracked via the
notifier interface.
We concluded that exposing all the services is not really
17 matches
Mail list logo
