Re: [PATCH] Unconditionally Remove Timeouts When DBus Says to Do So

Hi Grant, > Address an issue in which connman incorrectly handles DBus main > loop timeouts by only removing timeouts that are not enabled when > DBus requests a timeout removal. > > Please see http://lists.connman.net/pipermail/connman/2011-March/004147.html > for more information. > --- > gdb

Re: [PATCH] Unconditionally Remove Timeouts When DBus Says to Do So

Hi, On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:45:06AM -0800, Grant Erickson wrote: >> Address an issue in which connman incorrectly handles DBus main >> loop timeouts by only removing timeouts that are not enabled when >> DBus requests a timeou

Re: [PATCH] Unconditionally Remove Timeouts When DBus Says to Do So

Hi Grant, On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:45:06AM -0800, Grant Erickson wrote: > Address an issue in which connman incorrectly handles DBus main > loop timeouts by only removing timeouts that are not enabled when > DBus requests a timeout removal. > > Please see http://lists.connman.net/pipermail/con

[PATCH] Unconditionally Remove Timeouts When DBus Says to Do So

Address an issue in which connman incorrectly handles DBus main loop timeouts by only removing timeouts that are not enabled when DBus requests a timeout removal. Please see http://lists.connman.net/pipermail/connman/2011-March/004147.html for more information. --- gdbus/mainloop.c |3 --- 1