Send connman mailing list submissions to
        connman@lists.01.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
body 'help' to
        connman-requ...@lists.01.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        connman-ow...@lists.01.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of connman digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: [RFC connman 1/1] WIP: Add WPA3-SAE support (Marcel Holtmann)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 08:58:01 +0200
From: Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC connman 1/1] WIP: Add WPA3-SAE support
To: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessan...@collabora.com>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <w...@monom.org>, Andrej Shadura
        <andrew.shad...@collabora.co.uk>, connman@lists.01.org,
        sven.dembia...@bshg.com, i...@lists.01.org
Message-ID: <d847f4c3-eb57-4426-b75a-f1395be34...@holtmann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=utf-8

Hi Ariel,

>>>> I am not really into the WiFi topic anymore, so I am adding the iwd
>>>> mailing list. Maybe we get some input for the new SAE Security
>>>> property, e.g. how this could work with iwd.
>>> 
>>> don’t change the Service API. Even WPA3 Personal is just PSK and so there is
>>> no need to add another security property entry.
>> 
>> I somehow expected PSK also covers WPA3. This means any code for
>> enabling WPA3 for wpa_supplicant should go solely into plugins/wifi.c.
>> Thanks for clarifying this point.
> 
> Thanks for discussing the implementations details.
> 
> So AFAIU from the above, the patchset is implementing wpa_supplicant
> WPA3-SAE support in the right place: wifi plugin. Any change required? I
> understand that documentation should be updated probably, anything else?

if you need to update the Service API documentation, then you are doing 
something wrong.

>>> Actually if you are using iwd, then the detail between WPA2 and WPA3
>>> is never exposed to ConnMan.
>> 
>> Nice! I didn't know that iwd already supports WPA3.
> 
> I'm planning to extend the support to iwd in a follow-up patchset. I'd
> like to get this approved/merged first.

No idea what would be needed for iwd support. It already does support WPA3. 
With iwd, no changes to ConnMan are needed for WPA3 support.

Regards

Marcel

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
connman mailing list -- connman@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to connman-le...@lists.01.org


------------------------------

End of connman Digest, Vol 67, Issue 11
***************************************

Reply via email to