On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 7:51 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 29/12/2007, at 1:35 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> >
> > I was just going to leave it under continuum/trunk as continuum-docs
> > and continuum-site.
>
> Cool, thanks for that. Should be pretty straightforward to move th
On 30/12/2007, at 2:55 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I don't want to branch all of Continuum unless we're doing a 1.1.1
release, but we could branch just the continuum-docs module.
Thoughts?
The view I've started to take is that the documentation is best tied
to the release at the time. If there's
2007/12/29, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 28, 2007 7:51 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 29/12/2007, at 1:35 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> > > I was just going to leave it under continuum/trunk as continuum-docs
> > > and continuum-site.
> >
> > Cool, thanks for that. S
On Dec 29, 2007 8:55 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I moved the 1.1 docs to http://maven.apache.org/continuum/docs/1.1 and
> added a redirect (from /continuum/documentation/1_1) to the .htaccess
> file.
... and it synced the 1.1 directory, but not the contents that I moved
on the se
On Dec 28, 2007 7:51 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 29/12/2007, at 1:35 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> > I was just going to leave it under continuum/trunk as continuum-docs
> > and continuum-site.
>
> Cool, thanks for that. Should be pretty straightforward to move the
> site up at a
