Thanks Robert. With Tom's response on 'use-tell-based-protocol' config, I
started taking a peek at the changes required.
Was not aware of Vratko's gerrit. Will take a look at that too to sink it in
Regards
Muthu
-Original Message-
From: Robert Varga [mailto:n...@hq.sk]
Sent: Wednesda
Hello everyone,
sorry for the cross-post, but I want to make sure this reaches the
largest audience possible.
We have passed Nitrogen offset-0 M5, which means we are officially
code-frozen. The only exceptions to this are:
- bugfixes not requiring breaking API changes
- API deprecation patches
-
On 02/08/17 21:23, Robert Varga wrote:
> Not with module-based shards, no.
Sorry, I did not mean to sound this authoritative, as the answer comes
from my in-memory cache, which may not be accurate.
Tom, can you weigh in?
Thanks,
Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/08/17 18:15, Karthik Rajagopalan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
>
> I want to separate bgp related information under network
> topology in a separate shard and topology-netconf into a separate shard.
>
>
>
> Is this possible as both augument network topology?
>
Not
On 24/07/17 17:28, Muthukumaran K wrote:
> Hi Robert,
Hello Muthu,
sorry for the late response, this email got left behind in my drafts folder.
> This is in context of the changes for BZ-5280. We would like to test
> the changes on master branch. Have some clarifications on the same
>
>
>
>
Hi,
I want to separate bgp related information under network topology
in a separate shard and topology-netconf into a separate shard.
Is this possible as both augument network topology?
Regards,
Karthik
___
controller-dev ma
Correct, for instance, when calling ietf-netconf:commit, I use
curl -X POST \
http://localhost:8181/restconf/operations/network-topology:network-topology/topology/topology-netconf/node/NODE/yang-ext:mount/ietf-netconf:commit
\
-H 'accept: application/json' \
-H 'authorization: Basic YWRtaW
On 01/08/17 17:18, Tom Pantelis wrote:
> Does this mean that
>
> 1. The DS operation will definitely fail
>
> OR
>
> 2. Is it possible that the DS operation can eventually be
> successful
>
> __
>
>
> It might eventually succeed. AskTimeoutEx u
