On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 4:35 AM Michael Vorburger
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:42 AM Anil Vishnoi
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 2:30 AM Michael Vorburger
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, Tom, Robert, Stephen,
>>>
>>> Does commiting a transaction with no put/.../merge/delete operations on
On 27/07/18 13:34, Michael Vorburger wrote:
> What I am wondering if such a short cut optimization has any real value,
> and if it does if it shouldn't go into core MD SAL instead
> of ManagedNewTransactionRunner.
I do not believe it is worth the complexity it incurs. We used to
shortcut transacti
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:42 AM Anil Vishnoi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 2:30 AM Michael Vorburger
> wrote:
>
>> Hello, Tom, Robert, Stephen,
>>
>> Does commiting a transaction with no put/.../merge/delete operations on
>> that Tx have any noteworthy (real life) overhead compared to cancel
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 2:30 AM Michael Vorburger
wrote:
> Hello, Tom, Robert, Stephen,
>
> Does commiting a transaction with no put/.../merge/delete operations on
> that Tx have any noteworthy (real life) overhead compared to cancelling it?
>
> I am asking because that has come up in
>
>
> ht
Hello, Tom, Robert, Stephen,
Does commiting a transaction with no put/.../merge/delete operations on
that Tx have any noteworthy (real life) overhead compared to cancelling it?
I am asking because that has come up in
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/74506/1/lockmanager/lockmanager-impl/src
