[Cooker] Cooker Full Install - older packages

1999-09-30 Thread Mandrake Bugs
The apache package is 1.3.6, and the mod_perl package is 1.19 - both obsolete by their newer counterparts in Helios/6.1. I might be confused here, but shouldn't cooker be 'the latest' version and then some? It seems to still largely be based on 6.0, and then some, and limping behind 6.1 in

[Cooker] New rpm package

1999-09-30 Thread Olivier DUGEON - FT.CNET/BD/DAC/ARP
Hi, I made some rpm package : a2ps, gthemes (Gnome themes) for mandrake. Where can i put them? For who's made rpm package this emacs mode is pretty good : http://www.xemacs.org/~stigb/rpm-spec-mode.el Mandrake Team can you put it in the distro? Olivier --

Re: [Cooker] Cooker Full Install - older packages

1999-09-30 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Mandrake Bugs wrote: The apache package is 1.3.6, and the mod_perl package is 1.19 - both obsolete by their newer counterparts in Helios/6.1. I might be confused here, but shouldn't cooker be 'the latest' version and then some? It seems to still largely be based on

Re: [Cooker] Cooker Full Install - older packages

1999-09-30 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
i love talking to my self On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Axalon Bloodstone wrote: Me and Chmouel are back mergeing 6.1 into Cooker. Cooker should be up and running and normal efficiency by the middle of next week (*knock on wood*) Sorry lost track of the date, let me correct that to probably

Re: [Cooker] Cooker Full Install - older packages

1999-09-30 Thread Mandrake Bugs
Me and Chmouel are back mergeing 6.1 into Cooker. Cooker should be up and running and normal efficiency by the middle of next week (*knock on wood*) No problem, I just figured I would provide my impressions of the install. Alright, I'll just revert back to 6.0, and wait until your merge is

Re[2]: [Cooker] panoramix.diff

1999-09-30 Thread tracer
Hello Pixel, Thursday, Thursday, September 30, 1999, you wrote: Pixel tracer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So on checking a few I hit on this one of panoramix Did it get fixed Pixel now there is Pixel #: ../Xconfigurator_consts.pm_.c:7 Pixel msgid "16 million colors" Pixel msgstr ""

Re: [Cooker] panoramix.diff

1999-09-30 Thread Timothy Litwiller
They should but, cards with more than 8 meg memory are not using it for more colors they are using it to store lighting effects, textures and bumpmaps. Nora Etukudo wrote: On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 11:14:40PM +0700, tracer wrote: Pixel, unless my mail is out of sync, you invented a linux

Re: [Cooker] panoramix.diff

1999-09-30 Thread Nora Etukudo
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 10:11:12AM -0700, Mandrake Bugs wrote: How does the progression go in German? German English Hundert 100 hundred Tausend1,000 thousand Million1,000,000 million Milliarde

Re: [Cooker] panoramix.diff

1999-09-30 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Nora Etukudo wrote: On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 10:11:12AM -0700, Mandrake Bugs wrote: How does the progression go in German? German English Hundert 100 hundred Tausend1,000 thousand Million

Re: [Cooker] panoramix.diff

1999-09-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Nora Etukudo wrote: On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 11:40:55AM -0500, Timothy Litwiller wrote: They should but, cards with more than 8 meg memory are not using it for more colors they are using it to store lighting effects, textures and bumpmaps. Well, I don't understand

Re: [Cooker] panoramix.diff

1999-09-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
On 30 Sep 1999, Pixel wrote: well the problem is that 32bpp allow transparency which 24bpp does not allow. so even if visually 24bpp is the max number of colors in 32bpp you have *more* colors... Some cards support three color components in 32bpp, giving better-than-24-bpp resolution.

Re: [Cooker] panoramix.diff

1999-09-30 Thread Michael Beurskens
- Original Message - From: Mandrake Bugs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 7:11 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] panoramix.diff According to my (german) English-Dictionary should the english billion compared to the german

Re: [Cooker] panoramix.diff

1999-09-30 Thread Mandrake Bugs
Shouldn't that be NaCl? Naw, it's NaCl - and a bad typo on the closing parenthesis for good measure) Harry -- Beauty, brains, availability, personality - pick any two.

[Cooker] Is the Tekram dc-390u2w Supported?

1999-09-30 Thread Jake Johnson
I was wondering if the Mandrake 6.1 or cooker is supporting the Tekram dc-390u2w card. Really I was hoping that someone was using it for reasurance reasons. It has the symbios chipset so I think it will work but will autoprobe find it? Please add some insight to this if you know of anything

Re: [Cooker] Is the Tekram dc-390u2w Supported?

1999-09-30 Thread Jeff West
I am currently using this card with an IBM DRVS 10,000 RPM Ultra2 LVD SCSI Drive - works great, but the current drivers do not support the 80 MB / sec only 40 MB /sec - still good enough for my purposes. The installation should autodetect the controller and recognizes the NCR / Symbios Logic

[Cooker] kde2 and kdenlightenment

1999-09-30 Thread webmedic
Tried both of these. They are very interesting. I think I will use kfm and enlightenment for a while it runs faster than kwm and seems to be just as stable. Plus I get all the enlightenment goodies. About kde2; it seems that it would be more stable than this. It must run at least a little bit

Re: [Cooker] kde2 and kdenlightenment

1999-09-30 Thread Michael Irving
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, you wrote: Tried both of these. They are very interesting. I think I will use kfm and enlightenment for a while it runs faster than kwm and seems to be just as stable. Plus I get all the enlightenment goodies. The kde interface in E is pretty good now.. But it is

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] NAME: initscripts VER: 4.42 REL: 1mdk

1999-09-30 Thread Michael Irving
On Fri, 01 Oct 1999, you wrote: ChangeLog Automate [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --=-=-= Name: initscripts Distribution: Mandrake Version : 4.42 Vendor: MandrakeSoft [...] - Major update version, please test. Plesae pablo