Please see:
http://xfree86.org/~keithp/render/
It's very interesting, isn't?
Pawel Jablonski
On Sun Dec 10, 2000 at 11:55:26AM +0100, Alen Salamun wrote:
> Why are in updates dual versions of same stuff?? Like openssh-2.2 and openssh-2.3? I
>think previous version can be freely deleted or?
What mirror site are you looking at? There should only be 2.3 in
there, not 2.2. Looking at my
I don't know if the check is god enough, but it worked for me.
seb
--- macros.old Mon Dec 11 06:22:06 2000
+++ macros Mon Dec 11 06:25:57 2000
@@ -535,8 +535,11 @@
test -r ${dr}/aclocal.m4 && %{__chmod} u+w ${dr}/aclocal.m4; \
fi \
fi \
+ if grep "^AC_LIBLTD
Franck Martin wrote:
> How do I know which xfree86 I'm running?
ls -l /etc/X11/X
if it points to XFree, you're running 4.something; if it points to
XF86_something (often XF86_SVGA), you're running 3.3.x. If 4.*, you can look in
/var/log/XFree86.0.log for all the cory detail.
> How do I know if
Jean Meloche wrote:
> On Saturday 09 December 2000 15:20, you wrote:
>> Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>>> Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
OK, I have same problem on Banshee; message is ``failed to load kernel
module "tdfx"'' but the module is loaded (so is agpgart). I seem to
reme
There is a minor bug in xmms-1.2.4-1mdk. Attempting to add a .ogg file to
the playlist that has a title longer than what's allowed by the ID3 spec
will crash XMMS with a SIGSEGV. Probably a simple fixed-sized buffer
overflow. My apologies if this has already been reported, but
qa.mandr
I just force installed both, and XFree86 compiles and runs fine.
Frederic Lepied wrote:
>
> Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Glide_V3-DRI-devel and Glide_V2-devel are both needed to build XFree86
> > it seems, but the 2 packages have a file conflict:
> >
> > rpm -Uvh
> > fi
Yo.
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:23:02PM +, Vadim Plessky wrote:
>
> I uploaded QT-2.2-2 compiled for i686 architecture to my site:
> http://htmltests.newmail.ru/qt2-2.2.2-1mdk.i686.rpm
>
> Uploading speed was very low, so I was not able to upload qt2-doc and -devel
> But I guess they should
Cooker Expert Upgrade Development (almost full) - using hd.img.
VERSION: Linux-Mandrake Cooker-i586 20001209 4:01
For the first time the installer offered hardware acceleration using either
xf3 or xf4 for my Matrox G400, so I chose xf4 this time. It was s slow
until I added "modprobe agpg
> In fact, it's chkconfig --add that is desactivated when choosing msec
> custom option 'prevents rpm from automatically adding new services'.Not
> a very happy choice, as you can't neither anually use this command in
> this case. Maybe it would be better to prevents rpm to launch it, rather
> tha
On Sunday 10 December 2000 05:02, you wrote:
> Vadim Plessky wrote:
--snip--
> > 7 ??? 2000 06:03, Zeljko Vukman ???:
> > P.S. I have working QT 2.2.2 binary rpms for LM 7.2, and (god!) it is
> > i686 built. (not *default* i586)
> > If somebody is interested - let me know. Binary has bi
Still no DRI with the latest RPMS:
kernel-smp-2.4.0-0.12mdk
XFree86-4.0.1z-1mdk
and from /var/log/XFree86.0.log
...
(==) R128(0): Write-combining range (0xe000,0x100)
(WW) R128(0): Cannot read colourmap from VGA. Will restore with default
(0): [drm] created "r128" driver at busid "PCI:
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Glide_V3-DRI-devel and Glide_V2-devel are both needed to build XFree86
> it seems, but the 2 packages have a file conflict:
>
> rpm -Uvh
> file /usr/lib/libglide3.so from install of Glide_V3-DRI-devel-cvs-1mdk
> conflicts with file from package
I uploaded QT-2.2-2 compiled for i686 architecture to my site:
http://htmltests.newmail.ru/qt2-2.2.2-1mdk.i686.rpm
Uploading speed was very low, so I was not able to upload qt2-doc and -devel
But I guess they should be the same with i586 architecture.
By the way, does it make sense to have doc
Franck Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> May be a stupid question:
>
> How do I know which xfree86 I'm running?
(chmou@seatle)[~]-% xdpyinfo|grep "vendor string"
vendor string:Linux Mandrake (XFree86 4.0.1f, patch level 3mdk)
(chmou@seatle)[~]-%
> How do I know if cfree86 is using the
Jean Meloche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder if this is a similar problem. I have an ati rage 128 and
> I dont get DRM because of a bad version (from the XFree86 /var/log):
what kernel do you use ? i would advice to use the 2.4.x for this card.
--
MandrakeSoft Inc ht
Sunday 10 December 2000 04:02, ?? :
| Vadim Plessky wrote:
|
| Vadim,
| I would be VERY interested in getting copies of the spec files for both
| qt-2.2.2 and KDE 2.0.1. I've already downloaded the source for all but
| I prefer to build the rpms myself (I'm not really enamored o
> Alen Salamun a écrit :
>
> Hi!
>
> Changes to services (with drakxservices) are NOT written if security
> level is high! I had to change it to medium and reboot. Then changes
> were written!
In fact, it's chkconfig --add that is desactivated when choosing msec
custom option 'prevents rpm from
Hi!
Why are in updates dual versions of same stuff??
Like openssh-2.2 and openssh-2.3? I think previous version can be freely deleted
or?
Bye, Alen
Hi!
I have tried to "auto" configure ppp dial script.
Script has not created the proper chat script. Telephone number was not included
in chat-ppp0 so I had to manually add it. Also where is support for demand
dialing? I had to manually check the ifup-ppp script to figure out which
paramet
Hi!
Changes to services (with drakxservices)
are NOT written if security level is high! I had to change it to medium and
reboot. Then changes were written!
Bye, Alen
Hi!
Postfix package is STILL missing "rmail" script.
This script is necessary for uucp mail transfers and it is included in source
package of postfix! It should reside in /usr/bin! PLEASE fix that!
I have reported that in 7.1, but it was not
fixed!
Bye, Alen
Hi!
UUCP is stil not working out of the box, since it
doesn't have privileges to write to /var/log/uucp (even on medium security
level).
I have changed the group to uucp and added rx group
permission to /var/log/uucp and rwx group permission to
/var/log/uucp/*
This is a "bug" that was
Glide_V3-DRI-devel and Glide_V2-devel are both needed to build XFree86
it seems, but the 2 packages have a file conflict:
rpm -Uvh
file /usr/lib/libglide3.so from install of Glide_V3-DRI-devel-cvs-1mdk
conflicts with file from package Glide_V2-devel-2.53-5mdk
24 matches
Mail list logo
