Re: [Cooker] Do not renice X by default

2003-10-31 Thread Élie Charest
Never mind! I made a mistake in configuring the kernel (forgot to put CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT=y ... duh!) and everthing works after recompiling with the option selected. I'm so ashamed. Apart from that, what can I say...kernel 2.6 rocks! Le 31 Octobre 2003 08:25, Élie Charest a écrit : > Well, vga

Re: [Cooker] kernel 23mdk panic

2003-10-31 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne
Hi, reiserfs seems to be borked. In case -22mdk worked. Could you boot into -22mdk and fdisk -l /dev/hda or whatever holds your reiserfs partitions? And, a dd if=/dev/hda of=my_disk count=2 could help too. A little more information about the kernel panic would be helpful too as we can't telepa

Re: [Cooker] kernel 23mdk panic

2003-10-31 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne
Hi, reiserfs seems to be borked. Did it work with -22mdk?

[Cooker] [Bug 6267] [rpm-helper] New: /usr/share/rpm-helper/del-user doesn't do anything

2003-10-31 Thread [han]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6267 Summary: /usr/share/rpm-helper/del-user doesn't do anything Product: rpm-helper Version: 0.9-1mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-31 Thread Clive Dove
On Friday 31 October 2003 22:19, Robert L Martin wrote: > Daouda LO wrote: > >Really funny :)) > >Nice catch about the translation, Jan! > > > >Roger, "Arreter la presse (des CDS)" is a better translation for > >"STOP THE PRESSE(S)". > > I just hope that somebody did yell whatever is correct or el

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-10-31 Thread Svetoslav Slavtchev
> > > i would rather wait for a later bk snapshot > > > > > if the question is what to release I'd rather used test9 given two > > mentioned problems. > > Should I consider applying 2.6.0-test9-mm1 patchset ? > http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1070 > > The -love patchset from Gentoo guys has a lo

Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-31 Thread Robert L Martin
Daouda LO wrote: Really funny :)) Nice catch about the translation, Jan! Roger, "Arreter la presse (des CDS)" is a better translation for "STOP THE PRESSE(S)". I just hope that somebody did yell whatever is correct or else "Dude, My cd drive is dead" is going to be heard here in the US (Dell

Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-31 Thread Robert L Martin
Jan Ciger wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert L Martin wrote: | SomeDrake needs to post when the official "LG-SAFE" isos are ready (im | going to assume that | somebody yelled "STOP THE PRESSES" (aka via BF "ARRÊTEZ LES PRESSIONS") | when My French is poor, but as far as I

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-10-31 Thread Svetoslav Slavtchev
> > all FS's built in ? why that ? > > Oops, there is no reason to do that, I've now compiled ext3, jbd, > ReiserFS, jfs and xfs as modules in -2mdk. > ext2 is still built-in because our initrd image is ext2. > By the way, should we switch to ROM FS or Minix FS for initrd in order > to gain some

[Cooker] [Bug 6266] [bootsplash] rewritejpeg can't rewrite grayscale jpeg pictures

2003-10-31 Thread [oliv.blin]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6266 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 03:24 --- Created an attachment (id=949) --> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=949&action=view) grayscale jpeg support -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft

[Cooker] [Bug 6266] [bootsplash] New: rewritejpeg can't rewrite grayscale jpeg pictures

2003-10-31 Thread [oliv.blin]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6266 Summary: rewritejpeg can't rewrite grayscale jpeg pictures Product: bootsplash Version: 2.0.5-1mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-10-31 Thread Olivier Blin
> > i would rather wait for a later bk snapshot > > > if the question is what to release I'd rather used test9 given two > mentioned problems. Should I consider applying 2.6.0-test9-mm1 patchset ? http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1070 The -love patchset from Gentoo guys has a lot of new features

[Cooker] [Bug 6265] [bootsplash] detect-resolution should not report vga for default kernel

2003-10-31 Thread [oliv.blin]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6265 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 02:55 --- This patch may fix some issues when Windows is the default entry in lilo (the bootsplash picture wasn't added in the initrd by make-boot-splash) -- Configure bugmail

[Cooker] [Bug 6265] [bootsplash] detect-resolution should not report vga for default kernel

2003-10-31 Thread [oliv.blin]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6265 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 02:45 --- Created an attachment (id=948) --> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=948&action=view) give the initrd filename to detect-resolution -- Configure bugmail:

[Cooker] [Bug 6265] [bootsplash] detect-resolution should not report vga for default kernel

2003-10-31 Thread [oliv.blin]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6265 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-01 02:44 --- Created an attachment (id=947) --> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=947&action=view) use initrd filename in detect-resolution -- Configure bugmail: http

[Cooker] [Bug 6265] [bootsplash] New: detect-resolution should not report vga for default kernel

2003-10-31 Thread [oliv.blin]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6265 Summary: detect-resolution should not report vga for default kernel Product: bootsplash Version: 2.0.5-1mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Cooker] kernel 23mdk panic

2003-10-31 Thread Quel Qun
reiserfs seems to be borked. -- Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Cooker] Re: What is an LG CD-ROM?

2003-10-31 Thread Pierre Jarillon
Le Samedi 1 Novembre 2003 00:54, Juan Quintela a écrit : > evan> Haha, you mean still have horizontal lines (2) across them. I have a > evan> 19" Dell Trinitron (P992) that is only about a year old and has had > the evan> lines since new. > > I have been told that they were real wires to support

[Cooker] Test - please ignore

2003-10-31 Thread Quel Qun
I got two successive delivery failure :( -- Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-10-31 Thread Olivier Blin
> well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh > and here is the fix by Linus > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106722085714275&w=2 oups, I'll fix that in another release > CONFIG_SOUND=yes > CONFIG_SND=yes > > cause the problems with /etc/init.d/alsa > if set to =m everything is o

[Cooker] Re: What is an LG CD-ROM?

2003-10-31 Thread Juan Quintela
> "evan" == Evan Waite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi evan> Haha, you mean still have horizontal lines (2) across them. I have a evan> 19" Dell Trinitron (P992) that is only about a year old and has had the evan> lines since new. I have been told that they were real wires to support the re-

[Cooker] Re: What is an LG CD-ROM?

2003-10-31 Thread Juan Quintela
> "thierry" == Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: thierry> actually, unlike crt screens, it's hard to make an lcd screen without thierry> a few dead pixels (only one dead transistors and ...). thierry> [ well, on the contrary, high quality crt trinitron screens used to thierry> have

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk

2003-10-31 Thread bgmilne
> On 31-Oct-03 at 17:32, Buchan Milne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> But, I don't see the problem: >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ grep ^passwd /etc/nsswitch.conf >> passwd: files ldap >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ wc -l /etc/passwd >> 38 /etc/passwd > > Same for me here, so far. >

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk

2003-10-31 Thread Dominique Petitpierre
Hi, Thanks again for your help: On 31-Oct-03 at 17:32, Buchan Milne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -qf /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so > nss_ldap-207-4mdk > [EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ ldd -r /lib/libnss_ldap-2.3.2.so > libldap.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap.so.2

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6264] [drakxtools] New: drakperm does not save settings

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
[zefo] wrote: > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6264 > >Summary: drakperm does not save settings >Product: drakxtools >Version: 9.2-9mdk > Platform: PC > OS/Version: All > Status: UNCONFIRMED > Severity: normal

[Cooker] [Bug 6264] [drakxtools] New: drakperm does not save settings

2003-10-31 Thread [zefo]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6264 Summary: drakperm does not save settings Product: drakxtools Version: 9.2-9mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Cooker] [Bug 6263] [gnome-control-center] New: cannot change resolution, displays incorrect resolution

2003-10-31 Thread [cory.meisch]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6263 Summary: cannot change resolution, displays incorrect resolution Product: gnome-control-center Version: 2.3.6-1mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Cooker] Unable to vote for a bug

2003-10-31 Thread Cory Meisch
Getting internal server error. Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done t

[Cooker] [Bug 6262] [gcc] GCC-3.3.1-2mdk does not compila kernel-2.6.0-test9

2003-10-31 Thread [xevi1714]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6262 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 20:55 --- Hi, I upgrade gcc from cooker (gcc-3.3.1-4mdk) and the problem persists. Thanks a lot, Xevi. -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6259] [urpmi] cannot install grace if grace-devel is installed

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
[aol002] wrote: > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 > > Ok, thanks for your so fast answer. > You're right, the grace package is corrected. but I had a similar problem lastweek > on a cooker > (not in prod, so I overided in the same way I did it here) with another package I > can

[Cooker] [Bug 6262] [gcc] New: GCC-3.3.1-2mdk does not compila kernel-2.6.0-test9

2003-10-31 Thread [xevi1714]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6262 Summary: GCC-3.3.1-2mdk does not compila kernel-2.6.0-test9 Product: gcc Version: 3.3.1-2mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

Re: [Cooker] LG-proof kernel == -21mdk?

2003-10-31 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 09:18, Leon Brooks wrote: > > Do the updates include an LG-proof (LG == "Lame Goldstar") kernel > > yet? If so, what's an exact release number so I can check that my > > local mirror is up to speed? > > OK, Juan implies -21mdk should b

Re: [Cooker] LG-fixed cooker install available

2003-10-31 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Jim Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I remastered 9.2 with the files mentioned below (from cooker) > using the standard Mandrake script. When the installation starts > it shows the new kernel version. > > When it reaches the disk partitioning section, it does show the > Windows partitions bu

[Cooker] [Bug 6261] [xfig] xfig should be linked against Xaw3d

2003-10-31 Thread [gbburkhardt]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6261 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 18:56 --- Forgot this one: XCOMM USEINLINE = -DUSE_INLINE -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread Frank Griffin
FACORAT Fabrice wrote: I suffer from this too. But normally this has been corrected. If you launch filesystem check, the system should reboot automatically after. There are two interpretations for "misleading" here. The original complaint was that the message gave the impression you had to f

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread Eric Fernandez
FACORAT Fabrice wrote: I suffer from this too. But normally this has been corrected. If you launch filesystem check, the system should reboot automatically after. OK, actually since I got a disaster with it, I did not dare doing it again. I can check on the "experimental" 9.2 computer I have.

[Cooker] [Bug 6261] [xfig] xfig should be linked against Xaw3d

2003-10-31 Thread [gbburkhardt]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6261 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 18:44 --- Created an attachment (id=946) --> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=946&action=view) postscript options box obscures output file name, etc., when Xaw is us

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Eric Fernandez wrote: > > Buchan Milne wrote: > >> Are you *very* *very* sure this is still present in 9.2 >> >> It was there in 9.1, but it was fixed for 9.2. >> >> Please ensure that you are not confused, as I am sure (and I tested >> quite a few times with 9.2rc2) that it is fixed. >> > I

[Cooker] [Bug 6261] [xfig] New: xfig should be linked against Xaw3d

2003-10-31 Thread [gbburkhardt]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6261 Summary: xfig should be linked against Xaw3d Product: xfig Version: 3.2.4-2mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 C

Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils?

2003-10-31 Thread Luca Berra
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:29:24PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: BTW, it appears that autofs 4.1 has/will have direct mount support, including with maps in LDAP. Great! btw, is there a way of preventing dynamic to show on an icon on the desktop for every automounted directory? Regards, L. -- Luca Ber

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread Eric Fernandez
Buchan Milne wrote: Are you *very* *very* sure this is still present in 9.2 It was there in 9.1, but it was fixed for 9.2. Please ensure that you are not confused, as I am sure (and I tested quite a few times with 9.2rc2) that it is fixed. Regards, Buchan Yep, I definitely confirm on a n

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread FACORAT Fabrice
Le ven 31/10/2003 à 16:04, Eric Fernandez a écrit : > In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not > shut down cleanly, and a message appear : > "Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system check" > > Actually this is very misleading : if you do it with ext3, it does

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread Tim Sawchuck
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:12:50 +0200 Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed on electronic parchment: > Eric Fernandez wrote: > > In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not > > shut down cleanly, and a message appear : > > "Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system

[Cooker] [Bug 6138] [gnome-session] Unable to start gnome preference daemon

2003-10-31 Thread [fcrozat]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6138 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Additional Comments

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread Eric Fernandez
Buchan Milne wrote: Are you *very* *very* sure this is still present in 9.2 It was there in 9.1, but it was fixed for 9.2. Please ensure that you are not confused, as I am sure (and I tested quite a few times with 9.2rc2) that it is fixed. Regards, Buchan I am sure it still does it on

Re: [Cooker] jigdo cannot be installed on mdk92

2003-10-31 Thread Michael Scherer
On Friday 31 October 2003 14:44, Pascal Cavy wrote: > # urpmi jigdo > Some package requested cannot be installed: > jigdo-0.7.0-1mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied libwwwftp.so.0) (Y/n) n something is wrong on the mirror, because it work fines on other 9.2 libwwwftp.so.0 is provided by w3c-libwww can y

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Dominique Petitpierre wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your quick answer: > > On 31-Oct-03 at 16:38, Buchan Milne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>... >>I am running nss_ldap-207-2mdk on two cooker boxes without problems. >>... > > I just tried again with the latest cooker version: nss_ldap-207-4mdk >

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread danny
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Eric Fernandez wrote: > In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not > shut down cleanly, and a message appear : > "Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system check" > > Actually this is very misleading : if you do it with ext3, it does NOT >

[Cooker] [Bug 6259] [urpmi] cannot install grace if grace-devel is installed

2003-10-31 Thread [aol002]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6259 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 17:23 --- Ok, thanks for your so fast answer. You're right, the grace package is corrected. but I had a similar problem lastweek on a cooker (not in prod, so I overided in the

Re: [Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Eric Fernandez wrote: > In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not > shut down cleanly, and a message appear : > "Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system check" > > Actually this is very misleading : if you do it with ext3, it does NOT > use the journal and then

[Cooker] [9.2] misleading : Press Y within 5 seconds File system check

2003-10-31 Thread Eric Fernandez
In case of a hard-reset, init messages indicate the computer was not shut down cleanly, and a message appear : "Press Y within 5 seconds to force the file system check" Actually this is very misleading : if you do it with ext3, it does NOT use the journal and then you will experience system loss

Re: [Cooker] bugzilla package list a bit short

2003-10-31 Thread Eric Fernandez
Götz Waschk wrote: Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2003, 10:47:49 Uhr MET, schrieb Glenn Burkhardt: How does one report a bug to specific packages on Bugzilla? The list of packages is a bit short, as compared to the query page. I'd like to submit a bug for the xfig package. You're right, the p

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk

2003-10-31 Thread Dominique Petitpierre
Hi, Thanks for your quick answer: On 31-Oct-03 at 16:38, Buchan Milne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > ... > I am running nss_ldap-207-2mdk on two cooker boxes without problems. > ... I just tried again with the latest cooker version: nss_ldap-207-4mdk "ldd -r" still complains about "undefined symbo

Re: [Cooker] bugzilla package list a bit short

2003-10-31 Thread Götz Waschk
Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2003, 10:47:49 Uhr MET, schrieb Glenn Burkhardt: > How does one report a bug to specific packages on Bugzilla? The list > of packages is a bit short, as compared to the query page. I'd like to > submit a bug for the xfig package. You're right, the package list is currentl

[Cooker] bugzilla package list a bit short

2003-10-31 Thread Glenn Burkhardt
How does one report a bug to specific packages on Bugzilla? The list of packages is a bit short, as compared to the query page. I'd like to submit a bug for the xfig package. Thanks.

[Cooker] [Bug 6260] [rpmdrake] When installing package from club mirrors, rpmdrake/urpmi display login/pass in log

2003-10-31 Thread [gc]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 16:40 --- This is not a critical problem (and that's not a security breach, /var/log stuff is meant to be only read by root, see permissions on these files). But of course, this

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Dominique Petitpierre wrote: > Hello, > > On Mandrake 9.2 (Download version) I have observed a symptom that > is similar to the one discussed in the cooker mailing list thread > "[CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk" on September 18 and 19 > (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg124027.html): > A

Re: [Cooker] Re: What happened to am-utils?

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Bryan Whitehead wrote: > Buchan Milne wrote: > >> Bryan Whitehead wrote: >> >> >>> Thanks for the kick in the pants. Looks like autofs can do what I need. >>> Looks like this "feature" slipped in during 9.0 (or 8.2) and I didn't >>> notice. >>> >>> Now if only autofs would support direct mounts we

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk

2003-10-31 Thread Dominique Petitpierre
Hello, On Mandrake 9.2 (Download version) I have observed a symptom that is similar to the one discussed in the cooker mailing list thread "[CHRPM] nss_ldap-211-1mdk" on September 18 and 19 (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg124027.html): After configuring ldap, commands fail with t

[Cooker] [Bug 6257] [gcc] generates bad code with k6-2 optimizations

2003-10-31 Thread [waschk]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6257 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 15:42 --- OK, it seems to be a problem of the assembler. If I generate the assembler source with the following command, I can compile it just fine with the assembler on Mandrake 9

Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-31 Thread Daouda LO
Jan Ciger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Robert L Martin wrote: > | SomeDrake needs to post when the official "LG-SAFE" isos are ready (im > | going to assume that > | somebody yelled "STOP THE PRESSES" (aka via BF "ARRÊTEZ LES PRESSIONS") > | when > > My French is poor, but as far as I know, "pre

[Cooker] jigdo cannot be installed on mdk92

2003-10-31 Thread Pascal Cavy
# urpmi jigdo Some package requested cannot be installed: jigdo-0.7.0-1mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied libwwwftp.so.0) (Y/n) n -- Pascal Cavy - VMF - +33 (0)1 41 20 42 91 __ Running 3 days, 16:39, 1 user, load average: 0.39, 0.35, 0.3

[Cooker] [Bug 6260] [rpmdrake] New: When installing package from club mirrors, rpmdrake/urpmi display login/pass in log

2003-10-31 Thread [f.faber-pro]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6260 Summary: When installing package from club mirrors, rpmdrake/urpmi display login/pass in log Product: rpmdrake Version: 2.1-9mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: U

Re: [Cooker] Club RPMs?

2003-10-31 Thread FACORAT Fabrice
Le ven 31/10/2003 à 11:34, Daouda LO a écrit : > But i don't see any drakclub wizard material in there. > Launch drakclub to see what it does. It's not mandatory to be root but > you need root password to set up the urpmi sources otherwise only your > one month free club account is created. > Very

Re: [Cooker] Do not renice X by default

2003-10-31 Thread Élie Charest
Le 31 Octobre 2003 07:31, Con Kolivas a écrit : > On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:34, Élie Charest wrote: > > I am now happily testing out my homemade test9 kernel and so far, so > > good! The only thing not working seems to be the framebuffer console (I'm > > in 25x80 text mode now). In fact, I finally put

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6232] [userdrake] BuildRequires: pam-devel missing

2003-10-31 Thread Daouda LO
"[stefan]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6232 @resolution=fixed

Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-31 Thread Jan Ciger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert L Martin wrote: | SomeDrake needs to post when the official "LG-SAFE" isos are ready (im | going to assume that | somebody yelled "STOP THE PRESSES" (aka via BF "ARRÊTEZ LES PRESSIONS") | when My French is poor, but as far as I know, "pression" i

Re: [Cooker] Do not renice X by default

2003-10-31 Thread Con Kolivas
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:34, Élie Charest wrote: > Le 30 Octobre 2003 00:05, Con Kolivas a écrit : > > > By the way, adding in the supermount patch for test8 to test9 seems to > > > work fine - in fact, I haven't had any troubles except for my usb > > > scanner not being detected at all. > > > > Chan

Re: [Cooker] Club RPMs?

2003-10-31 Thread Steffen Barszus
Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2003 11:12 schrieb Daouda LO: > > Hey, that looks like it should be kinda cool. I say "should be" > > because it prompts me for my login, password and root password, > > goes and configures the urpmi source and then hangs without ever > > going back to the wizard. > > Maybe

Re: [Cooker] Club RPMs?

2003-10-31 Thread Eric Fernandez
Daouda LO wrote: Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I wrote a guide about it there : http://www.zebulon.org.uk/ICML0.HTML But i don't see any drakclub wizard material in there. Launch drakclub to see what it does. It's not mandatory to be root but you need root password to set u

Re: [Cooker] Club RPMs?

2003-10-31 Thread Daouda LO
Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I wrote a guide about it there : > http://www.zebulon.org.uk/ICML0.HTML But i don't see any drakclub wizard material in there. Launch drakclub to see what it does. It's not mandatory to be root but you need root password to set up the urpmi sources oth

Re: [Cooker] Club RPMs?

2003-10-31 Thread Eric Fernandez
I wrote a guide about it there : http://www.zebulon.org.uk/ICML0.HTML Eric Daouda LO wrote: Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Sunday 26 October 2003 11:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please, it shouldn't be this hard to find the fsckin' urpmi setup for club. Someone at Mdk pull their head

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-10-31 Thread Svetoslav Slavtchev
> > > > > > > > > PS. > > > > is serial console working for everyone ? > > > > i just tried it and when fbcon took over vgacon, > > > > it stopped logging to ttyS0 > > > > is this normal behaviour ? > > > > > > > > > > apparently not. I guess James Simmons may be interested :) BTW have > you >

Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-31 Thread Jaco Greeff
On Friday 31 October 2003 11:16, Buchan Milne wrote: > Robert L Martin wrote: > > btw you might want to include how to tell the difference (like maybe the > > win32 auto run reads linux-Mandrake 9.2a?) > > It would be enough to make it say 9.2 ;-). *lol*

Re: [Cooker] Club RPMs?

2003-10-31 Thread Daouda LO
Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 26 October 2003 11:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Please, it shouldn't be this hard to find the fsckin' urpmi > > > setup for club. Someone at Mdk pull their head out and put > > > this somewhere quasi-prominent. It is THE primary reason for > > > me

Re: [Cooker] Club RPMs?

2003-10-31 Thread Daouda LO
Brad Felmey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 10:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > You've tried: > > > > # drakclub > > Curl is broken. I have to run urpmi.addmedia --wget on the command line. drakclub explicitely use --wget to fetch packages. > I finally found it, but the

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-10-31 Thread "Andrey Borzenkov"
> > > > > PS. > > > is serial console working for everyone ? > > > i just tried it and when fbcon took over vgacon, > > > it stopped logging to ttyS0 > > > is this normal behaviour ? > > > > > > > apparently not. I guess James Simmons may be interested :) BTW have you > > tried > > actually on

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-10-31 Thread Svetoslav Slavtchev
> > > > > > > well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh > > > > > > Do you seriously mean anyone is using them? Or does it apply to ssh as > > > well? > > > > > > > well, > > > > it was reported by 3-4 people on lkml :-) > > > > Ah, if you mean that, it was not rsh. The OOB data delivery wa

[Cooker] [Bug 6167] [evolution] Newer versions of Evolution (1.4.4) is much slower with big IMAP4 mailboxes

2003-10-31 Thread [edtandi]
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6167 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-10-31 10:17 --- OK, I have installed 1.4.5. It is noticably more responsive when applying filters and when retrieving individual e-mails, but big delays still occur when Evolution first

Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Robert L Martin wrote: > SomeDrake needs to post when the official "LG-SAFE" isos are ready Why not just leave everyone in the dark? That would be better? (IOW, no kidding, but the ISOs aren't available). > (im > going to assume that > somebody yelled "STOP THE PRESSES" (aka via BF "ARRÊTEZ LES

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-10-31 Thread "Andrey Borzenkov"
> > > > well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh > > > > Do you seriously mean anyone is using them? Or does it apply to ssh as > > well? > > > > well, > > it was reported by 3-4 people on lkml :-) > Ah, if you mean that, it was not rsh. The OOB data delivery was broken and this is used by

Re: [Cooker] Eclipse 2.1 hangs ... ?

2003-10-31 Thread Buchan Milne
Thomas Lionel SMETS wrote: > I upgraded my MDK 9.0 to 9.1 9.1 is an ancient (for this list) release. Please send your question to list that deals with the stable releases (not the list that is working on 10.0 now). > from a CD & have now KDE desktop instead of > Gnome. Moreover I decided to do an

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-10-31 Thread Svetoslav Slavtchev
> > well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh > > Do you seriously mean anyone is using them? Or does it apply to ssh as > well? > well, it was reported by 3-4 people on lkml :-) besides Linus is currently accepting only _real_bug_fixes_ and i have the impression that somehow -bk's are more st

Re: [Cooker] Why doesn't kde require X

2003-10-31 Thread "Andrey Borzenkov"
> I was setting up a chroot environment tonight and I did > > 'urpmi --root /mnt/newroot kmail' > > and XFree86 did not get installed. Is this normal or correct? you need XFree86-libs to run X11 programs and XFree86 to run them on local display. You may as well want to run them on remote display

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.6-test8 rpms

2003-10-31 Thread "Andrey Borzenkov"
> well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh Do you seriously mean anyone is using them? Or does it apply to ssh as well?

Re: [Cooker] Do not renice X by default

2003-10-31 Thread "Andrey Borzenkov"
>> names) or you're not mounting the new usbfs. Put this into your /etc/fstab >> : >> >> none /proc/bus/usb usbfs defaults 0 0 > I tried and still my scanner wouldn't work. The weird thing is that it would > appear in the /proc/bus/usb/devices and in usbview. Do you mean it works under 2.4? Col

[Cooker] Eclipse 2.1 hangs ... ?

2003-10-31 Thread Thomas Lionel SMETS
I upgraded my MDK 9.0 to 9.1 from a CD & have now KDE desktop instead of Gnome. Moreover I decided to do an install with a 'higher' ('standart' < 'High' < 'Higher' < 'Paranoid') security Level. The install went OK but know I seem to have lost a fair-bit of steering power. If I try to start LinuxC