Re: [Cooker] postfix and sasl

2003-06-16 Thread Alan Schmitt
* Luca Berra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 10:18:26PM -0400, Alan Schmitt wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I upgraded postfix to postfix-2.0.12-2mdk and suddenly I cannot seem to > >authenticate to my mail server anymore. > > > >Here is a detaile

[Cooker] postfix and sasl

2003-06-15 Thread Alan Schmitt
sasl_passwd smtp_sasl_security_options = I'd be very grateful for some help on how to make it work again. Thanks a lot, Alan Schmitt PS: please CC me as I am not subscribed to the list -- The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.

[Cooker] installing makedev loops

2003-03-25 Thread Alan Schmitt
ch file or directory) stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/dev/ida", 0xbfffe060) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) stat64("/dev/cciss", 0xbfffe060)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) Am I doing

[Cooker] new Xfree question

2002-12-26 Thread Alan Schmitt
hint about these. Alan Schmitt -- The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.

[Cooker] drakconf segfault: dependency problem with perl-GTK-GdkImlib ?

2002-09-04 Thread Alan Schmitt
answer to this mail, I'm not on this list anymore, it was too much trafic ;-) Alan Schmitt -- The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] vim-6.1-9mdk

2002-06-03 Thread Alan Schmitt
* Thierry Vignaud ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: vim Relocations: (not relocateable) > Version : 6.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft About vim, I noticed that the packaged version (in 8.2, haven't checked cooker yet, I'm stuck

Re: [Cooker] Re: ocaml libraries packages

2002-06-03 Thread Alan Schmitt
* Pixel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Alan Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hum, i'm quite relunctant having both library which have the same > purpose... but since ocamltk (really is labltk) is in main, there can > be the other one in contrib. > > so, i'

Re: [Cooker] Re: ocaml libraries packages

2002-06-02 Thread Alan Schmitt
* Pixel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Alan Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It's two different bindings. Labltk is included in the ocaml > > distribution, whereas camltk comes separately. > > well, my question was more: is there any advantage having cam

Re: [Cooker] Re: ocaml libraries packages

2002-06-02 Thread Alan Schmitt
* Pixel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > camltk (tk bindings for camel) is packages as a caml subpackage, bearing ocmal > > 3.04 version whereas its own home page http://pauillac.inria.fr/camltk claims > > current version is 0.418. Why not create a