Re: [Cooker] 9.2 ISOs has been sent

2003-09-24 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 24, 2003 01:27 pm, Blindauer Emmanuel wrote: > > I'd just ask that someone let me know when to start it. I may be a > > 'newbie' and not much good for anything else but I do try to help in any > > way I can. > > I don't agree. I've partciped

Re: [Cooker] 9.2 ISOs has been sent

2003-09-24 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 24, 2003 10:43 am, Teletchéa Stéphane wrote: > Le mer 24/09/2003 à 18:02, Rob a écrit : > > On Wednesday 24 September 2003 11:38, Teletchéa Stéphane wrote: > > > Last time, is there a chance one could have an iso without > > > paying ? > > >

Re: [Cooker] urpmi OpenOffice.org weirdness

2003-09-15 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 15, 2003 03:04 am, François Pons wrote: > > Without a urpmi bug report, I can't do nothing on this topic, please > send me a urpmi bug report. > > François. I had the same problem but don't have a bug report. I did get my install "fixed" t

[Cooker] Expired certificate on qa server?

2003-09-11 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My bit torrent died over night; and when I tried to restart it I got time out errors. So I tried to get to the wiki page, but I got Timeout on sever messages in Konqueror. Seein' as I'm using a release candidate of Mandrake Linux with attendant "go

Re: [Cooker] gnome2.4

2003-09-10 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 10, 2003 12:38 pm, Austin wrote: > I just wanted to say thanks to Fred C. for getting Gnome 2.4.0 into > Mandrake 9.2. It works, it's beautiful, it's reliable, and it's > functional. And thanks to Warly for breaking policy to get it in! > >

Re: [Cooker] 9.2 rc2 and bittorrent

2003-09-10 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 8, 2003 04:21 am, Warly wrote: > In order to have a more solid base, would some of you with good > bandwith could get the ISO in advance and let their client up do have > everything spreading faster ? Hi; Except for 2 electric whoopsies (po

Re: [Cooker] 9.2 rc2 and bittorrent

2003-09-08 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 8, 2003 04:21 am, Warly wrote: > In order to have a more solid base, would some of you with good > bandwith could get the ISO in advance and let their client up do have > everything spreading faster ? On it immediately if I knew where to get

Re: [Cooker] XFree86-libs - pb finding.

2003-09-05 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 5, 2003 03:31 am, Buchan Milne wrote: > What do you mean "broke" ? If you don't use "--force" or "--nodeps", > you shouldn't be able to break your box, and if you can, it's a bug. I've never used "--force" or "--nodeps" on a package. That

Re: [Cooker] XFree86-libs - pb finding.

2003-09-04 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 5, 2003 12:09 am, Paul Dorman wrote: > > Or did SCO steal that too? :) > > > > I've been getting exactly the same message for most of the last 8 > > to 10 hours. I have no idea what the devil it means. Other than the > > XFree package is a n

Re: [Cooker] XFree86-libs - pb finding.

2003-09-04 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 4, 2003 11:24 pm, guran wrote: > Hi > > I can't upgrade this: > ... > Some package requested cannot be installed: > XFree86-xfs-4.3-21mdk.i586 (due to unsatisfied XFree86-libs[== > 4.3-21mdk]) ... > ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm -q --pro

Re: [Cooker] swapper not mounted

2003-09-04 Thread Charlie M.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 September 4, 2003 11:18 pm, Felix Miata wrote: > I rsync'd sunet.se cooker a few hours ago and installed fresh. Now > mount shows me /dev/sda6 swap not mounted. Rc1 upgrade of 9.1 worked > OK a couple days ago. How do I figure out why swap doesn't moun

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rxvt-2.7.10-3mdk

2003-09-04 Thread Charlie M.
September 4, 2003 02:46 am, andre wrote: > On Thursday 04 September 2003 12:39, David Baudens wrote: > > Problem is that a terminal emulator is not needed for an > > office/multimedia/internet/ect. workstation. So, if people who > > install computer don't explictly say he want to use a terminal, >

Re: [Cooker] fat32 problem

2002-09-29 Thread Charlie M.
On Sunday 29 September 2002 9:28 am, J. Greenlees wrote: > Brent, > have you an old win98 ebd? ( emergency boot disk ) > when I run into problems like that I use one to format the entire > partition.. > if you don't have one I can see if I can turn mine into an image and > send to you. ( I know I

Re: [Cooker] Nondeliverable mail: j.van.maris@hetnet.nl

2002-09-19 Thread Charlie M.
On Thursday 19 September 2002 4:03 pm, Todd Lyons wrote: > David Walluck wrote on Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 01:56:42PM -0400 : > > Maybe someone wants to take this guy off the list? His mails keep > > bouncing back to me. > > The day the messages started bouncing, I sent an email to the list > administ

[Cooker] My apologies.

2002-09-06 Thread Charlie M.
It's a reflex for me to capitalise names. It won't happen again. -- Charlie

Re: [Cooker] Re: Drakconf won't start since latest update; or it can't.

2002-09-03 Thread Charlie M.
On Saturday 31 August 2002 7:39 am, huug wrote: > > Well, it doesn't run from Gnome or the command line either, so let's > just wait for a new version. It's working great since the update that same afternoon Huug. Or was it the next morning? The next version had the 'fix' and since it still w

[Cooker] Drakconf won't start since latest update; or it can't.

2002-08-30 Thread Charlie M.
I brought my install up to date this afternoon as usual, and now drakconf starts to initialize then displays the errors attached when started from a terminal. From the KDE>Configuration>Mandrake Control Center menu it seems to be starting (loading please wait dialog shows) but never quite make

Re: [Cooker] No Sound in Mandrake 9 Beta 4 (?)

2002-08-28 Thread Charlie M.
On Wednesday 28 August 2002 11:12 am, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > if you want to debug this, you can > - see what's the default driver with lspcidrake -v > - see what's the current configured driver in /etc/modules.conf with > fgrep sound-slot /etc/modules.conf > - see if it's loaded with /sbin/l

Re: [Cooker] More crash detail for Konqueror

2002-08-27 Thread Charlie M.
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 1:10 pm, Robert Fox wrote: > Could somebody please confirm this problem exists (besides myself!) > > I have not seen anyone else report this and no reaction from the developers > . . > > Attached is the backtrace - > > Once again, Konqueror crashes when I try to click on

[Cooker] Wrong sigs on mirrors still

2002-08-10 Thread Charlie M.
Howdy; Got the following from a couple of the mirrors I tried to update from: The signature of the package 'rxzvt-2.7.8-5mdk.i586.rpm' is not correct: also: texutils-2.1-1mdk.i586.rpm No GPG signature in package Do you want to install it anyway?" Yes and No boxes There was another one as we

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 BETA - Bug report / Possible bug - cannot installboot loader on XFS f

2002-08-09 Thread Charlie M.
On Friday 09 August 2002 04:26 pm, Alan Shoemaker wrote: > mandrakeexpert incident 28907 forwarded to cooker. 8.2 was installed on XFS partitions on this system and the only trouble that I had was making a boot disk. Then I re-installed it with a separate ext3 /boot partition. beta2 would inst

Re: [Cooker] Cooker as of 22/06/2002 pressing F1 more options oninstall CD

2002-08-09 Thread Charlie M.
On Friday 09 August 2002 05:17 am, John J. Allen wrote: > Pressing F1 more options on install CD, just produces a nice blue screen. For me also. I 've read about 'grey' screens from others. Mine was a very pale lavender-blue color. I accidentally managed to get the "more options" screen once by

Re: [Cooker] mkcd and creating the larger ISOs

2002-08-09 Thread Charlie M.
On Friday 09 August 2002 02:41 am, Tom Whiting wrote: > On Friday 09 August 2002 03:24 am, Robert Fox wrote: > > Could someone shed some light on the correct command to create a set of > > CDs from the latest Cooker (the 700MB Cds) > > > > Thx, > > R.Fox > > According to SOME these work. Unfortuna