I just built the xfig rpm from the .src.rpm on cooker.
Compilation and installation went fine.
To tickle the bug:
After firing it up, go to `help' and bink
on Xfig Reference (HTML)
You should get an error dialog box
that says
/usr/share/doc/xfig/html/index.html is not installed, please
Austin, as I just wrote you in private mail, I'm trying another build because
I found some funnies in my alternatives system.
But I'll comment on your remarks below, nonetheless.
Austin Acton
:: On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 23:26, Dean S. Messing wrote:
:: No it is getting created during the build
Austin Acton wrotes:
:: The %post macro is executed *only* when you install the actual
:: i586.rpm. It is not involved in the build process at all.
::
Ok. Thanks. I didn't know this (which just shows how profoundly
ignorant I really am!)
:: I know how to make sure there are no leftovers.
This is to report that with the cleanup of my alternatives stuff
for libgcj the gcc-3.2.1 build went through just fine.
Just for fun I did a
rpm -e --nodeps $(cat files | sed 's/\.athlon.rpm//')
where `files' contained the 21 .rpm names associated to gcc-3.2.1.
I then did
rpm -Uvh files
and
I posted a (possible) cooker bug here yesterday.
The bug appears in the build process for gcc-3.2.1
on my athlon machine.
It's entitled:
[Cooker] Bug in gcc-3.2.1 .src.rpm build
and can be found here:
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/archives/cooker/2003-01/msg00286.php
I have seen no
Sorry for the gory details below. I know no other way
to communicate exactly what I did, what I found, c, so
someone can find the build bug (or my config bug).
Todd Lyons writes:
:: Dean S. Messing wrote on Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 12:28:14PM -0800 :
::
:: + ln -s /usr/include/libgcj-3.2.1
Austin Acton wrote:
:: Seems hard to believe that error.
Yeah. I know.
:: If you're just doing
:: rpm -ba
:: it won't make ANY difference what processor you're using.
Unless there's some logic in the .spec file that detects processor
and branches differently. The .spec file for MPlayer
Austin Acton writes:
:: $ rpm -bb gcc.spec
:: worked perfectly on my dual Athlon 1900
::
:: $ rpmbuild -bb --target=athlonxp gcc.spec
:: failed to even get underway, but that's because I have no
:: athlonxp-mandrake-linux-gnu target on my machine
::
:: Are you 100% sure your rpm/BUILD
same thing as processor 0.
Dean S. Messing
Display Algorithms Visual Optimization Lab
Information Systems Technologies Dept.
Sharp Laboratories of America
I just sent the magic command
SET cooker DIGEST to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The reply was that cooker does not allow digestification.
Why in the world not?
Dean
10 matches
Mail list logo
