I just built the xfig rpm from the .src.rpm on cooker.
Compilation and installation went fine.
To tickle the bug:
After firing it up, go to `help' and bink
on Xfig Reference (HTML)
You should get an error dialog box
that says
/usr/share/doc/xfig/html/index.html is not installed, please install
This is to report that with the cleanup of my "alternatives" stuff
for libgcj the gcc-3.2.1 build went through just fine.
Just for fun I did a
rpm -e --nodeps $(cat files | sed 's/\.athlon.rpm//')
where `files' contained the 21 .rpm names associated to gcc-3.2.1.
I then did
rpm -Uvh files
an
Austin Acton wrotes:
:: The %post macro is executed *only* when you install the actual
:: i586.rpm. It is not involved in the build process at all.
::
Ok. Thanks. I didn't know this (which just shows how profoundly
ignorant I really am!)
:: > I know how to make sure there are no leftovers.
Austin, as I just wrote you in private mail, I'm trying another build because
I found some funnies in my "alternatives" system.
But I'll comment on your remarks below, nonetheless.
Austin Acton
:: On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 23:26, Dean S. Messing wrote:
:: > No it is get
Austin Acton writes:
:: $ rpm -bb gcc.spec
:: worked perfectly on my dual Athlon 1900
::
:: $ rpmbuild -bb --target=athlonxp gcc.spec
:: failed to even get underway, but that's because I have no
:: athlonxp-mandrake-linux-gnu target on my machine
::
:: Are you 100% sure your rpm/BUILD an
Austin Acton wrote:
:: Seems hard to believe that error.
Yeah. I know.
:: If you're just doing
:: rpm -ba
:: it won't make ANY difference what processor you're using.
Unless there's some logic in the .spec file that detects processor
and branches differently. The .spec file for MPlayer cert
Sorry for the gory details below. I know no other way
to communicate exactly what I did, what I found, &c, so
someone can find the build bug (or my config bug).
Todd Lyons writes:
:: Dean S. Messing wrote on Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 12:28:14PM -0800 :
:: >
:: > + ln -s /usr/include/li
I posted a (possible) cooker bug here yesterday.
The bug appears in the build process for gcc-3.2.1
on my athlon machine.
It's entitled:
[Cooker] Bug in gcc-3.2.1 .src.rpm build
and can be found here:
http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/archives/cooker/2003-01/msg00286.php
I have seen no remarks,
I just sent the magic command
SET cooker DIGEST to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The reply was that cooker does not allow digestification.
Why in the world not?
Dean
.76
processor: 1
same thing as processor 0.
Dean S. Messing
Display Algorithms & Visual Optimization Lab
Information Systems Technologies Dept.
Sharp Laboratories of America
10 matches
Mail list logo
