rivers for Linux (4349))
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ken Mays" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Eric Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)
>
>
> > I&#
y, April 03, 2003 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Ken Mays" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidi
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ken Mays" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent
I had the ATI 9600/9200 boards in another email but this should cover
anyone's interest.
ATI support Linux/FreeBSD work
but rely on the "X" windowing developers (i.e. XIG, XFree86 teams) and
distributors like Mandrake (through MandrakeClub primarily). I included the
link to the RPM for the Radeon
You may not have read ATI's website on the Linux support issue. They support
Linux/FreeBSD work
but rely on the "X" windowing developers (i.e. XIG, XFree86 teams). I
included the link to the RPM for the Radeon 9700/PRO. The ATI Radeon
9800/PRO, 9600, 9200 boards were just recently released as of ye
I just checked the sources of Gnome 2.2.1 and noticed the March 15, 2003
timestamps (ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/desktop/2.2/2.2.1/sources/).
Although I'd like to see Mandrake be the first distro of Gnome v2.2.1 in the
next v9.1, would the wait for the Mandrake v9.1 release be worth it include
certain
I think everyone would hate the fact that they couldn't replace v9.0 with
v9.1 since v9.1 was determined "unstable" for production use.
As far as KDE/Gnome or any other non-Mandrake specific app, we can only spec
out the "stable" apps and how the dependency apps/packages are reliable as
well. Many
Is Mandrake 9.1 meant to be released without the final v2.4.21 kernel?!?
Just seems a little 'chicken before egg'.
the installer detected smp systems and offered loaded an smp enabled
> kernel. The current version of the installer (as of last nights rsync
> anyway) does not.
>
> Darren
> On February 20, 2003 11:30 am, Ken Mays wrote:
> > The kernel is new so I'd wonder if Mandrake h
The kernel is new so I'd wonder if Mandrake has release a big memory, SMP
kernel version of 2.4.21-pre4 or waiting for the final code of 2.4.21.
Stick with Mandrake 9.0 for production SMP! ;oP
-Ken
- Original Message -
From: "Darren_Lissimore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
I am monitoring the X.org and Xfree86.org sites and noticed XFree86 v4.3.0
was due on 27-Feb-03. Is there
some thoughts on waiting for this release before a
major code/package freeze???
-Ken
Would there be any issues upgrading glibc to v2.3.1
-Ken
- Original Message -
From: "Bret Baptist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] 9.1 packages version freeze and rc 1
> On Tuesday 18 February 2003 10:08 am,
Any using dual and 4-cpu motherboards from Tyan or some other vendor that
works well under Mandrake 9.1 beta 3??
Ken
Anyone testing DHCP on Mandrake 9.1b3?
Looking for tests on the latest 3.0pl2 and 3.0.1rc11 versions.
Thxs!
-Ken
14 matches
Mail list logo
