Re: [Cooker] ReiserFS and NFSv3 together in LM 8.0?

2001-03-03 Thread Michael R. Batchelor
>> OK, I haven't really been following the cooker/LM8.0 stuff too well, >> and I couldn't find any reference in the archives about whether the >> new release is expected to support ReiserFS and NFSv3 (or even v2 for >> that matter) together out of the box or not. > >Yup, we have tested the patches

[Cooker] ReiserFS and NFSv3 together in LM 8.0?

2001-03-02 Thread Michael R. Batchelor
OK, I haven't really been following the cooker/LM8.0 stuff too well, and I couldn't find any reference in the archives about whether the new release is expected to support ReiserFS and NFSv3 (or even v2 for that matter) together out of the box or not. Is this a planned/supported configuration? I

Re: [Cooker] Xfree 4.0.2

2000-12-21 Thread Michael R. Batchelor
Guillaume answered: >Neal Pitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'd pay a subscription fee for a service that backported certain >> "interesting" packages from cooker to the release version if it meant I >> could see them in say, maybe a month of release time. Why pay money? To >> encourage spee

Re: [Cooker] Zip 250 drives don't hold 250MB !

2000-11-15 Thread Michael R. Batchelor
>I have managed to get 160Mb on it, but with fewer files. I know when you run >things like fsck the output says something like /zz files. I have >always assumed that zz is the maximum number of files possible on the disk. >Is there a finite limit of files that Linux (or indeed any OS)

Re: [Cooker] Sad state of pre-releasing to consumers

2000-11-01 Thread Michael R. Batchelor
>Sad development, but Mandrake is becoming more and more like Microsoft. Or perhaps Mandrake is becoming more and more like a successful business. I'm sorry, crusades as for people who don't have to support themselves. Witness Richard Stallman. He's a crusader, not a businessman, and he's been b

Re: [Cooker] Sad state of pre-releasing to consumers

2000-10-31 Thread Michael R. Batchelor
> Is this really that important to MandrakeSoft? Don't get caught up in >allowing Walmart to dictate the terms. What is more important stable release >or Nov 1st target. If Walmart won't take it past a given date, politely >remind them about how well the product is selling at Staples. (Yes lie, m

Re: [Cooker] i486 Release?

2000-10-18 Thread Michael R. Batchelor
>> I'd like to see a 7.2/486 ISO not long after the >> 7.2/586 is released. [...] >For that matter, why not also have a 686 version ;) Both sound good to me, but remember these guys are trying to run a business. How are they going to resell either one of those versions. I actually loaded the 7.0