I've been looking for the auto-reply message in Bugzilla. Maybe setting a
time frame plus the looking for the auto-reply message is good enough to
track all of these down? But once we have located these, what should be
done with them?
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, John Keller wrote:
Neal Pitts
I've noticed a few old bugs in Bugzilla that have been sitting around for
a while because the original reporter hasn't updated anything.
Is there some way a volunteer can help clean up bug entries like this?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I found an interesting issue with kuser v1.0 today. It looks like kuser
will not generate MD5 passwords, but only the old style crypt
passwords. I found out this issue when trying kuser for the first time
and making a new user account, and the user found only the first eight
characters of his
And here I thought that executable .sig thin was a joke... I thought it
was a way to distribute viruses. :)
On 15 Nov 2001, Ryan Little wrote:
On Thu, 2001-11-15 at 08:42, Mike Tracy Holt wrote:
Frederic Crozat wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 05:44:14 +0100, Ryan Little wrote:
Just
Has anyone else experienced IMAP problems with the latest Evolution
package in cooker? Two things happen for me. First, I never get my
message list off the server; second, the mail component crashes after
about five minutes.
This might be a Ximian problem, but I was curious if anyone else here
I have somewhat similar issues with Konqueror and my Intel i815. I'm
running Kernel 2.4-22 and Xfree86 4.03-3.
On 11 Apr 2001 22:14:29 -0800, michael wrote:
what could be causing this video problem? Never happened with 3.3.6 and my
voodoo3 2000.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think RPM 4.0 will solve your problems.
On 24 Mar 2001 19:16:48 -0800, Matthew D. Pitts wrote:
I have a small problem here with rpm. I installed rpm-3.0.5-27mdk on my
system from a src.rpm that I downloaded. Now I can't install rpms with major
version numbers less than 3. Is this an error
Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
When I'm logged inn to a remote server with ssh, I get this errormessage:
Couldn't read from random pool "/dev/urandom": Resource temporarily
unavailable
Same error over here... Only saw it once though...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What problem are you having? I have a motherboard with an i815e and I
ran video under 7.2 and currently under 8.0 alpha with no problems. I
believe the actual driver name will say i810, but as I understand it,
the video processor in the i810 and the i815e are the same...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had these same problems with the Mandrake 8.0 ISO. I fixed them by
manually loading the CD kernel module as root:
insmod sr_mod
Worked like a charm. I was also distressed when I found out the module
didn't autoload. Here's the description of my SCSI card from
I don't think so. Looks like the kernel module isn't loaded until a
filesystem in /etc/fstab is accessed. I also tried to make my root
partition with reiser and got the same results.
Ruairi Hickey wrote:
Doing an install with Sunday's cooker and setting the / partition to be
reiserfs
I finally got it installed using the --no-scripts option for rpm, but
this turned out to be a bad thing, and many of my other installed
programs refused to work. One thing I didn't try was upgrading to rpm
4.0 first.
Kallador wrote:
ok when i try to rpm
the glibc 2.2 i think it was 21mdk
I'd pay a subscription fee for a service that backported certain
"interesting" packages from cooker to the release version if it meant I
could see them in say, maybe a month of release time. Why pay money?
To encourage speedy releases, and to benifit from the integration that
Mandrake does
I had a similar issue when trying to install cooker via tftp for sparc.
Maybe this script mod would work for me as well?
Good luck to me...
Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
/sbin/mkinitrd seems to be a script... I changed
if [ `uname -m` = "ia64" ]; then
IMAGESIZE=3000
else
I found many packages were not safe to run, at least not without a lot
of work involved to make them work. I downloaded many cooker packages
just after installing 7.2 (only because I like breaking the software I
depend on :)) only to find out they would not install normally. I
ended up
Michael R. Batchelor wrote:
I think it's clear, to me at least, that a small company cannot possibly
stay in business if they've got too much legacy support. However, I do
understand the point of backporting things to the current release.
Mandrake obviously does this with the security
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
Vadim Plessky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thursday 21 December 2000 11:58, Guillaume Cottenceau ???:
| Neal Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|I'd pay a subscription fee for a service that backported certain
|"interesting" packages f
17 matches
Mail list logo
