http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2991
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 22:05 ---
*** Bug 2992 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2991
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|UNC
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Co
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 09:52 ---
I have found that using Helvetica looks substantially better than Luxi Sans, but
it would be better to have anti-aliasing working ...
--- You are receiving this m
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|drakfont
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Co
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 09:33 ---
What filesystem (FAT32 or NTFS) are the fonts on that you are importing? If it
is NTFS, this could be a duplicate of bug 427
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2883
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Co
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2935
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1984
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 09:32 ---
You do not need to reinstall to get X back, try:
# service dm restart
But you may have two bugs here, firstly bug 427 (importing fonts from NTFS,
which has a fix in pr
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2920
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2329
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 21:53 ---
*** Bug 1431 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2796
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 19:44 ---
DHCP doesn´t work for me. I access the internet through a hardware router.
I have to set my IP and the Gateway manually to get Internet Access.
Please give more detail!
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2829
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 19:43 ---
Note that /etc/hosts should not need to contain more that:
127.0.0.1 localhost
(localhost.localdomain should never be set as a hostname).
tmdns should take care
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 19:32 ---
This may not be the same issue. Does your network card get an IP address (check
with /sbin/ifconfig)? Can it ping the gateway? What is in /etc/resolv.conf
(PLEASE ANSWE
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2553
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
for though I don't know) of having a different
zeroconf name than the hostname (this is ridiculous really).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -q drakxtools
drakxtools-9.1-11mdk
(Mandrake 9.1rc1).
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, o
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2585
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-07 16:53 ---
OK, that report of it working was from my cooker box which runs:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -q lisa
lisa-3.1-22mdk
My rc2 installation on my laptop:
[EMAIL
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2660
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2585
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2585
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments F
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 21:00 ---
Still valid in:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -q kdebase kdelibs
kdebase-3.1-72mdk
kdelibs-3.1-52mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$
(newest available on my mirror)
This is quite irritating when trying to migrate users from windows ...
--- You
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 21:02 ---
Still valid:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bgmilne]$ rpm -q libqt3-devel
libqt3-devel-3.1.1-13mdk
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--- Reminder: ---
assigned_to
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2617
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-04 21:40 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you get a chance to test this again, please try with the new
samba3-3.0-0.alpha21.4mdk packages. If it does not work no
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2650
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2679
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|73 |1353
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2617
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|97 |1353
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-26 15:49 ---
KDE bug entry:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52314
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching some
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2356
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|73 |1353
--- Additional Comments From
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional C
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1730
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-19 13:10 ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pixel wrote:
(probably
And XFS.
And XFS on LVM over software RAID kicks butt! Redhat of course does not
have XFS or ACL
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 19:20 ---
warly wrote:
Looks good, have not tested it a real setup yet, I am waiting for RC1 to
test winbind setup on.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Yo
401 - 461 of 461 matches
Mail list logo