http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6116
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-11 18:02 ---
Yes seguso you are right. I thought long ago they'd have fixed this by now.
The scrollbar in the galaxy theme should have something on it, preferably something in
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6245
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-11 19:15 ---
xvt is an alternative, a symlink in /etc/alternatives that can point to one of many
terminals. It should point to rxvt usually, if it doesn't you can fix that
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5975
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-10 01:00 ---
Or at least use my soundwrapper. GC never got around to looking at it.
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5958
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-25-09 12:00 ---
Alt-F2
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5940
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-25-09 00:10 ---
But what key *is* the Multi_key? Mandrake used to set it up out of the box so that
the right windows key was, but that hasn't been the case in a long time, and at
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5335
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-24-09 01:50 ---
that's hilarious. The mozilla people can't make up their mind in the Alt vs. Ctrl
thing. It used to be Alt to go along with other old Unix apps including Netscape 4,
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5653
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-14-09 17:20 ---
The real bug is that KDE stores configuration files under /usr instead of /etc. We've
discussed fixing this in the past, maybe one day it'll actually happen.
--
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5077
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-09 04:00 ---
Just one crack showing in the system of having the major number in the RPM name :/
Also, urpmi really does need to handle this kind of problem better. It should give
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4268
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 14:10 ---
autofs is a good way to go, but there is no bug here, and no intention of pushing
anything.
mount -a doesn't mount any network mounts, that's not anything new.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3074
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-09 03:40 ---
Since it will be examined later, and only won't be fixed *for 9.2* shouldn't you have
marked this resolved as LATER and not WONTFIX?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4994
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-01-09 12:42 ---
They shouldn't use konsole explicitly at all. They should use the alternativized
xvt which points to rxvt (and one could change to konsole if they desired)
--
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-05 01:50 ---
But you make the mistake of assuming all changes and suggested changes to rpmdrake are
for experts. I target my changes at all rpmdrake users, including newbies.
I
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #411 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3633
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-04 08:50 ---
Thanks, GC. Is it still fixed now?
Or do you still want an example program? I do have one actually.
You're right that in rpmdrake, when you first pull up a long
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=386
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-04 09:00 ---
I agree with your last statement. menudrake doesn't support hotkeys, so I have to run
kmenuedit manually.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3633
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-02 12:40 ---
Well I posted a screenshot of the final result. A before is not necessary, because
everybody's already running the before version.
The screenshot I posted shows the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3631
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3633
Product: drakxtools
Component: program
Summary: gtktext_insert leaves cursor at the end (ugtk2.pm)
Version: 9.1-26mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-02 07:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=419)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=419action=view)
Screenshot showing massive UI improvement in MandrakeUpdate with latest
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-01 01:30 ---
Didn't the standard security level used to be 3? It is 2 now, and at that level
TMPDIR doesn't get set to $HOME/tmp (why?) so we have now taken a step backward.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-01 01:40 ---
I'm just jumping in here, I have a different monitor. Where are we supposed to report
the info you mention? For me, I have:
19.13 inches monitor (truly 17.72') EISA
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
Product: rpmdrake
Component: program
Summary: maximal info bits in the wrong places (install/remove)
Version: 2.1-14mdk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-31 02:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=407)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=407action=view)
Patch to fix rpmdrake
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-31 02:15 ---
One additional comment. I don't think it makes sense that these two pieces of
information are
shown only during maximal information. They should be shown as part of
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-31 02:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=408)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=408action=view)
Patch to fix both issues
--- You are receiving this mail
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-31 05:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=410)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=410action=view)
Major fixes for get_info
Ok, I've attached the latest patch,
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3610
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-31 05:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=411)
-- (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=411action=view)
cleans up crowded MandrakeUpdate info window
I've attached
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3560
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3571
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3509
Product: Installation
Component: Installation
Summary: packages selection: can't deselect required package even
if another package satisfies
Version: 1.809
Platform: PC
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3380
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 23:00 ---
Don't worry about this. It's safer to use /dev/ttyS0 than /dev/modem
anyway because of locking.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3241
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-14 05:10 ---
It is set in these files (for bash and tcsh respectively):
/etc/profile.d/proxy.sh
/etc/profile.d/proxy.csh
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3194
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 11:30 ---
As I suspected, it's still broken. I'll attach the file from 7.2 that
worked. To: Goetz (and I'd be able to do the umlaut if Multi_key
worked...) I'm sure there's
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3194
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 11:30 ---
Hopefully this will work. Ignore the check this out
at the top :o).
This is the file /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/en_US from MDK
7.2, when Multi_key last worked. Compare it
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3194
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 11:50 ---
oh, Alt_R, I got you. Looks like my forward didn't work, I'll have to
try to DL the file and attach it.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3194
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 12:00 ---
Oh nevermind, my message forward did attach the two files. The first
one is:
/etc/X11/xkb/symbols/en_US
and the second one is:
/etc/X11/xkb/symbols/us
--- You
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2820
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 12:30 ---
Maybe Laurent is not watching the bug? Maybe someone should e-mail him
a link.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3194
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3194
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-12 04:20 ---
The right Windows key (one with the evil symbol, not the arrow and the
pulldown menu) is supposed to be the Multi_key. The way it's supposed
to work, is you hit the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|148 |6618
Status|NEW
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=362
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 15:01 ---
Agreed. Also see this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg84350.html
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2993
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3064
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-10 01:40 ---
Are you absolutely sure? This was fixed in -9mdk. Please make sure the
package version you're running, and what package version you select in
Bugzilla match.
If
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2796
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 21:20 ---
To Levi:
As far as the route command hanging, it's probably hanging on a
(failing) DNS lookup. Try route -n
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2837
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|13 |6618
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2864
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 22:40 ---
Is it also true of gdm? If so, it may be a network-related problem.
Those can cause X and such to take forever to start.
--- You are receiving this mail
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2820
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-06 12:00 ---
Does anything else in kdeadmin need those libraries? Maybe they should
be in the kpackage subpackage, which wouldn't require kdeadmin then.
--- You are
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=282
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-01 21:40 ---
What does that have to do with this bug?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-01 21:50 ---
I believe the kdevelop package is patched to allow it to work with old
autoconf/automake. Can you verify the package also works with the newer
ones if you install it
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=311
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-01 21:50 ---
I agree this should be fixed, but also if it breaks any applications,
those apps are broken too (and their authors should probably be notified).
--- You are
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-28 15:00 ---
Yes of course you can do it that way, but why does it not give you that
choice when you log out anymore?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2341
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-24 23:30 ---
You need to give more information.
What sound card do you have? What module is it using for the sound card
(you can see in /etc/modules.conf )?
What module did 9.0
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2343
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-24 23:30 ---
Does installing the latest galaxy-kde package help?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #210 is|0 |1
obsolete|
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-21 22:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=210)
-- (https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=210action=view)
Don't #define DEBUG, so apcupsd actually *will* close standard
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-22 01:10 ---
Ok, the upstream author is going to make sure STDIN gets closed no
matter what.
BTW, on your fixed version, did you use both patches attached to this
bug, or just
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-22 01:50 ---
The problem is carroll is your primary US mirror right?
Unfortunately it's a pretty sucky mirror. FTP only allows 25
connections and the web server (HTTP access)
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2067
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-22 02:20 ---
I just saw an article today where some moron switched from Mandrake 9.0
to RedHat (8.0 even!) because of that.
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-22 02:50 ---
That doesn't make sense. We are both dealing with 3.10.5. I have built
the package myself (as have you if you're running your fixed version
from the other bug),
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|13 |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-22 05:20 ---
Well I suppose the daemon should be closing STDIN no matter what then.
Maybe it's less dangerous if it's not /dev/console? Maybe not?
I think /dev/vc/ is just
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-22 05:21 ---
Whoa, cool it down there. I was responding to fpons, not you (his idea
carroll is removed form the list).
I agree handling sucky mirrors better would be nice
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-20 20:10 ---
fcrozat (Mandrake GNOME guy) tells me galaxy is not a pixmap theme, so
to be able to get the same functionality as Geramik they'd have to
implement their own thing,
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|97 |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-19 17:10 ---
Could you include the netfilter patch from bug 1019?
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019
If you look at the code I'm sure you'll be comfortable with it.
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|1580|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1730
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-19 00:30 ---
I think I remember hearing Mandrake employees say when we're shipping
2.6 we'll use LVM by default.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 15:40 ---
So does the problem persist after restarting apcupsd?
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 17:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=187)
-- (https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=187action=view)
have network information server close standard file handles
Save
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|1558|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 18:40 ---
Grr, it let me change assigned_to
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 20:20 ---
Ok, I'll keep looking into it.
If anybody else can confirm this, let me know.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-16 15:40 ---
I cannot reproduce this with apcupsd 3.10.5, on Linux or Solaris 9.
I can reproduce this with older versions of apcupsd. Give me the output
of the following
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-16 20:00 ---
Maybe you should have the gcc 2.96 package not create the colorgcc
subpackage.
(sorry for the extra message, Mozilla bug...)
--- You are receiving this mail
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-16 20:20 ---
Is anybody else running apcupsd 3.10.5 that can or can't reproduce this?
I just don't see how it can be. apcupsd's main() calls daemon_start()
which fork()'s,
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-16 20:40 ---
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
What?
I assume you're talking about colorgccrc point to the actual binaries
instead of the alternativized symlinks, which you're right,
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-17 04:40 ---
That those PIDs from your ps axf listing are not in numeric order in
that tree is curious. Try running this command:
service apcupsd restart
waiting a couple
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|13 |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
91 matches
Mail list logo
