I agree, it very nicely indicates software that is in development mode
and potentially quite unstable. It has my vote.
John
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
> Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [ creating a hack root menu group for hack*applis ]
> > What do you think? Stupid idea, is
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ creating a hack root menu group for hack*applis ]
> What do you think? Stupid idea, isn't it?
good idea for me, but flepied is the last voice on this subject.
--
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
Pasadena, CA USA
--Original Message--
From: Civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 9, 2000 10:29:48 PM GMT
Subject: Re: [Cooker] "hack" menu group
On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> Let's make a "hack" menu group. When some package is in develop
On Fri, 09 Jun 2000, you wrote:
> Let's make a "hack" menu group. When some package is in development
> (hackgimp, hackmozilla, etc. etc.) we can put those packages in there
> (with the same structure --> hackmozilla = Hack/Networking/WWW ).
>
> The advantage I see is that the menu system is alrea
Let's make a "hack" menu group. When some package is in development
(hackgimp, hackmozilla, etc. etc.) we can put those packages in there
(with the same structure --> hackmozilla = Hack/Networking/WWW ).
The advantage I see is that the menu system is already put into these
packages, and keeping t
