A Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:26:46 +0200
Danny Tholen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
> On Monday 31 March 2003 20:13, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> Ha, and why didn't anybody notice this before?!
I thought that kernel features were heavy tested by the kernel team.
Linux-Mandrake is not only a desktop distib
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Larry Nguyen wrote:
> > We are going to need a kernel update for this very soon if anyone wants
> > to have a good reputation for 9.1 (specifically samba use) ... 8.1
> > through 9.0 had working ACLs, and Redhat 9 will be the first release
> > with ACLs ...
>
> on ext3? I dou
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Danny Tholen wrote:
> On Monday 31 March 2003 20:13, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> Ha, and why didn't anybody notice this before?!
>
Because it happened post-rc1 (I am sure I tested ACLs in RC1), and I was
too busy tracking down the dhcp issues post-rc2, plus I did most of my
t
Buchan Milne wrote:
We are going to need a kernel update for this very soon if anyone wants
to have a good reputation for 9.1 (specifically samba use) ... 8.1
through 9.0 had working ACLs, and Redhat 9 will be the first release
with ACLs ...
Though there's been no support in fileutils (at least in
Buchan Milne wrote:
Also, you can't mount ext3 with the acl option, so I guess acls are
toasted on ext3 too.
We are going to need a kernel update for this very soon if anyone wants
to have a good reputation for 9.1 (specifically samba use) ... 8.1
through 9.0 had working ACLs, and Redhat 9 will be
On Monday 31 March 2003 20:26, Danny Tholen wrote:
>
> Not really toasted, just not enabled. Patches are applied, but ACL is
> missing from the 2.4.21-pre4q13/configs/ files.
oops, mea culpa,
the addition CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL itself is not in any patch anymore it seems.
d.
On Monday 31 March 2003 20:13, Buchan Milne wrote:
Ha, and why didn't anybody notice this before?!
>
> Also, you can't mount ext3 with the acl option, so I guess acls are
> toasted on ext3 too.
Not really toasted, just not enabled. Patches are applied, but ACL is missing
from the 2.4.21-pre4q13/
A Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:13:38 +0200
Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
>
> Also, you can't mount ext3 with the acl option, so I guess acls are
> toasted on ext3 too.
Damned :/
I test it too ... yes, ext3 with ACLs seems to be broken :/
>
> We are going to need a kernel update for this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jean-sébastien HUBERT wrote:
> A Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:51:20 -0500 (EST)
> greeneg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
>
>
>>http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3615
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-31
18:51 -
A Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:51:20 -0500 (EST)
greeneg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait:
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3615
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-31 18:51 ---
> if I'm not mistaken, you need to have the following in the options of the
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3615
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-31 19:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=414)
--> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=414&action=view)
still not working
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3615
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-31 18:51 ---
if I'm not mistaken, you need to have the following in the options of the mounted
device in you fstab for the acls to apply
/dev/hdaX / xfs acls 1 1
--- You
12 matches
Mail list logo
