On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Well, this returns us to the original bug report, which is that netfs is
> started too soon after network, and ifplugd may not have waited long
> enough to guarantee the network is up before netfs starts.
ifplugd only waits until the ethernet cable is conn
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, [luigiwalser] wrote:
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4268
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 14:10 ---
> autofs is a good way to go, but there is no bug here, and no intention
> of pushing anything.
>
> mount -a doesn't mount any
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4268
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 14:27 ---
David Walser wrote:
> autofs is a good way to go, but there is no bug here, and no intention of
pushing anything.
"pushing" ? I don't understand. There _is_ a bug here
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4268
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 14:10 ---
autofs is a good way to go, but there is no bug here, and no intention of pushing
anything.
mount -a doesn't mount any network mounts, that's not anything new.
servic
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4268
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 13:46 ---
A brief update:
mount -a does not work for NFS mounts. Is this a deliberate and concious move
towards using autofs?
> Try:
> # urpmi autofs
> # service autofs start
T
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4268
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-24-08 02:54 ---
> Try:
> # mount -a
Doh!
> Actually, autofs is a better solution for this in the end ... but I guess
> small networks are too small for autofs.
Actually, I might not
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, [edtandi] wrote:
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4268
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-08 22:33 ---
> I have seen this too. I thought it was a race condition exaggerated by the
> faster boot-time using kernel 2.6.x. Quite bad re
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4268
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-23-08 22:33 ---
I have seen this too. I thought it was a race condition exaggerated by the
faster boot-time using kernel 2.6.x. Quite bad really, I have to manually
re-mount 6 NFS mount
