http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 11:40 ---
BTW, note also that the appropriate link mf -> mf-nowin will
be created running:
texlinks
or
texconfig init
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userpr
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 01:16 ---
OK, patched texconfig will be merged in next tetex-2.0.2-9mdk...
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 01:12 ---
Yes, I tried switching to several different devices (ljfour, ljfive, ljfzzz),
and xdvi appeared to be configured correctly each time.
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 01:01 ---
I tried the new texconfig and it works.
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Y
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 01:06 ---
Works also providing the right resolution in XDvi of before?
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this m
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 00:54 ---
Please, without installing tetex-mfwin (which of course would
provide /usr/bin/mf) can you try the texconfig in attach?
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.c
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 00:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=755)
--> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=755&action=view)
texconfig using mf-nowin
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakeso
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 00:50 ---
I see. Well, I created a symbolic link from mf-nowin to mf, and texconfig
worked. Perhaps there ought to be a configuration mechanism to make texconfig
use mf-nowin when
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 00:40 ---
mf is part of tetex-mfwin. the tetex package should have mf-nowin
for this purpose (which is exactly like mf, but doesn't depent on X11 libraries),
so I wonder why texco
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 00:26 ---
Well, apparently there is a program, /usr/bin/mf which texconfig calls, but for
some reason it's not installed, so the script fails. Do you have any idea which
package i
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-06-09 00:06 ---
Now next step is to understand why texconfig has omitted resolution
in the XDvi file. Does that happens only for ljfzzz,
or also for other METAFONT modes?
--
Configur
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-09 23:31 ---
XDvi is where the problem was. I had changed the printer type to ljfzzz (LJ with
1200 dpi resolution) with texconfig, but for some reason texconfig managed to
mangle XDv
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-09 23:21 ---
hmmm, /usr/bin/xdvi probably has timestamp changed because
you added strace (well, I was saying to do add strace in a copy of it...).
Files in /usr/share/texmf/web2c has
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-09 23:13 ---
a) I reinstalled bash (because I had changed some of the files in /etc/skel),
then created a new user, and tried xdvi again, but it failed in the exact same
manner as be
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-09 12:48 ---
alternatively can you try:
a) on a clean new user (i.e. a new created user, without pre-existing .*rc* files).
b) verify the tetex installtion with rpm -V tetex-xdvi (
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-09 12:40 ---
Sound like bash (/bin/sh) is broken...
--
Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Yo
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-09 21:43 ---
I ran strace on xdvi.bin (the resulting output is attached); it seems like
xdvi.bin is receiving the correct arguments, after all. Interestingly enough,
running xdvi.bi
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-09 21:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=749)
--> (http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=749&action=view)
Output of strace xdvi.bin
This is the output of strace strace xdvi.bi
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5262
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-09 21:06 ---
Sorry but I can't reproduce it here, with same version, e.g.:
xdvi /usr/share/doc/sane-backends/1.0.12/sane.dvi
will correctly show the .dvi file.
Can you try runn
19 matches
Mail list logo
