Re: [Cooker] [Bug 759] [urpmi] New: urpmi should not consider unrelated unresolved dependencies

2003-01-08 Thread rcc
So my question is why would this unrelated unresolved dependency be added? Or using the example from above, why does it want to remove SuperFoo which has an unresolved dependency on IBM-JDK even though nothing else that I am installing/upgrading has any requirement on IBM-JDK (or anything

[Cooker] [Bug 759] [urpmi] New: urpmi should not consider unrelated unresolved dependencies

2003-01-08 Thread [Bug 759]
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759 Product: urpmi Component: urpmi Summary: urpmi should not consider unrelated unresolved dependencies Version: 4.2-4mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status:

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 759] [urpmi] New: urpmi should not consider unrelated unresolved dependencies

2003-01-08 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Fox wrote on Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:49:33PM -0600 : On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:26, rcc wrote: regardless of the question - which seems valid to me - why don't you just repackage SuperFoo and remove its dependency on IBM-JDK? I can