On Wed Sep 03, 2003 at 02:22:04PM +0100, John Allen wrote:
> > I'm not sure what benefit having releases like this would give. Either
> > you're patched or not. I can't think of any company that could devote
> > resources to a new release on the schedule that a point-point release
> > demands. Esp
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 12:02, John Keller wrote:
> John Allen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:17, Radek Vybiral wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Robert Pollak wrote:
> > > > John Keller wrote:
> > > > > Cooker is always in flux but at certain moments, snapshots are
> > > > > ma
John Allen wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:17, Radek Vybiral wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Robert Pollak wrote:
> > > John Keller wrote:
> > > > Cooker is always in flux but at certain moments, snapshots are made.
> > >
> > > Does this mean there will be no further stabilizing branch af
Robert Pollak wrote:
> John Keller wrote:
> > Cooker is always in flux but at certain moments, snapshots are made.
>
> Does this mean there will be no further stabilizing branch after 9.2, to
> eventually get a 9.2.1?
9.2 *is* the stabilizing release. It's intended to be the stable sucessor to
9
