Re: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker

2001-02-28 Thread Mattias Dahlberg
Radek.Vybiral wrote: > All kernel messages are available on console #2, so if don't like > GREAT MATRIX THEME with Trinity you may switch and booting is > normal. Yes, it's great. Linux Progress Patch, LPP, is definitely something for cooker, so people can try it and give their opinions on it.

Re: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker

2001-02-27 Thread David Walluck
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Ian C. Sison wrote: > Wouldn't it really be a cool thing, having the Mandrake Logo appear on an > installed system rather than just have the grapical logo appear at the > bootable CD splash screen? Actually, the boot logo also appears from the hard disk if you run in framebu

Re: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker

2001-02-27 Thread Ian C. Sison
Hey thanks for seconding the motion! I'd even like to push this further and ask that it be included in the 2.2.19-series which was mentioned that chmoel will be hacking on these next days... Wouldn't it really be a cool thing, having the Mandrake Logo appear on an installed system rather than j

Re: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker

2001-02-27 Thread Radek Vybiral
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Ian C. Sison wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: > > > > > This issue has been brought out before, but not quite accepted. The > > reason.. can only recall faintly, not really everybody are willing to > > ignore all kernel messages, and it's really use

RE: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker

2001-02-27 Thread Ian C. Sison
lf Of Ian C. Sison > > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 5:24 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker > > > > > > > > Hello anyone on the mandrake team, > > > > Assuming we would like for a

RE: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker

2001-02-27 Thread Steve Wray
Where can I get this patch, please? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ian C. Sison > Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 5:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch an

Re: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker

2001-02-26 Thread Ian C. Sison
It doesn't have to be all or nothing. For instance, Aurora has this "textboot" kernel command line option that allows you to skip the graphical screen and go right down to the nitty gritty. I am not sure about LPP, but a really well designed system should support both "debug" and "end-user" mod

RE: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker

2001-02-26 Thread Steve Wray
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R.I.P. Deaddog > > This issue has been brought out before, but not quite accepted. The > reason.. can only recall faintly, not really everybody are willing to > ignore all kernel messages, and it's really useful to many users for > debugging or determi

Re: [Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker

2001-02-26 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
This issue has been brought out before, but not quite accepted. The reason.. can only recall faintly, not really everybody are willing to ignore all kernel messages, and it's really useful to many users for debugging or determining problem during booting process..? Abel Cheung On Tue,

[Cooker] [REQUEST] Linux Progress Patch and Aurora in cooker

2001-02-26 Thread Ian C. Sison
Hello anyone on the mandrake team, Assuming we would like for a totally user friendly "face" to a mandrake system booting up, Aurora seems to be a big step forward, could you integrate the Linux Progress Patch as well - so end users would never have to see "scary" text messages when the system i