Re: [Cooker] 2.4.13-11mdk

2001-11-25 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Juan Quintela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > They are going to be provided by glibc, but Chmouel need that I get > first this kernel out to get the headers. i just uploaded it sorry for the delay.

Re: [Cooker] 2.4.13-11mdk

2001-11-23 Thread Rainer Koschnick
On 23 Nov 2001 18:12:09 +0100 Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > le ven 23-11-2001 à 17:49, Onur Kucuk a écrit : > > > > While all the rpms of the new kernel in the cooker is 2.4.13-11 , > > why is the kernel-headers still -10 ? Does it mean the headers did > > not change,use thi

Re: [Cooker] 2.4.13-11mdk

2001-11-23 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le ven 23-11-2001 à 17:49, Onur Kucuk a écrit : > > While all the rpms of the new kernel in the cooker is 2.4.13-11 , > why is the kernel-headers still -10 ? Does it mean the headers did > not change,use this one? Though at least shouldnt the name of the > package change? > > I checked

RE: [Cooker] 2.4.13-11mdk

2001-11-23 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
> > While all the rpms of the new kernel in the cooker is 2.4.13-11 , > why is the kernel-headers still -10 ? Does it mean the headers did > not change,use this one? Though at least shouldnt the name of the > package change? > rpm -q --changelog kernel-2.4.13-11mdk

[Cooker] 2.4.13-11mdk

2001-11-23 Thread Onur Kucuk
While all the rpms of the new kernel in the cooker is 2.4.13-11 , why is the kernel-headers still -10 ? Does it mean the headers did not change,use this one? Though at least shouldnt the name of the package change? I checked sunet.se and ciril.fr . If new kernel-headers are in another