Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-25 Thread Luca Olivetti
James Sparenberg wrote: Mine reads [EMAIL PROTECTED]<8d>[EMAIL PROTECTED]<85>±hî^Lu¤hÃ<82>e<9a>L<8d><92>ï¾n\Ã^Xô^_æüÃX ÃV;R0<99>I^Sþ<84>Ãçþ\á!Ã.dà Ãx'áR<9a>°^Q(·6Ã.Ãù<9e>½ æ]<82>Ãüt<8f>$¢äó^R^X<8c>Ã^_°LüQï©<94>Ãm®ÃQi¸Ã¤9"KøãÃ<84>ÃYB®^Z=G*(Ãmrº^U±éJÃt:%ÃÃ

RE: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-24 Thread James Sparenberg
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 10:52, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 18:35, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote: > > You can't just put the names of the modules to load in the file. At least it > > didn't work for me. Can you supply the correct syntax? As it stands I just > > wrote a startu

RE: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 18:35, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote: > You can't just put the names of the modules to load in the file. At least it > didn't work for me. Can you supply the correct syntax? As it stands I just > wrote a startup script that insmods the modules at boot... Well, that wor

RE: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-24 Thread MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1)
TED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No idea on the second point. On the first point the answer currently > is no; Mandrake stuck ACPI in the kernel but don't appear to

Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 22 Feb 2003, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote: > [snip] > I get the feeling if someone would just write some damn *documentation* > for the current ACPI implementation we'd find out all sorts of cool > things it does. As it stands, anyone who isn't a deve

Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No idea on the second point. On the first point the answer currently is > no; Mandrake stuck ACPI in the kernel but don't appear to have made any > attempt at getting the appropriate should be done shortly.. > modules loaded automatically. Which is d

Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-22 Thread Jack Coates
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 00:10, Randy Welch wrote: ... > > If you had a modern laptop, you'd be happy to get that because it > > wouldn't happen without ACPI :-) > > > > What's classed as a modern laptop? ;-) > > I have an A22p that won't suspend with ACPI loaded up ( and I have to > load it up

Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-22 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 00:10, Randy Welch wrote: > Jack Coates wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 19:48, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > >>On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Do not know. I am using acpi on my IBM 600X, which seems to work ok, > >>>except that I do not see an

Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-22 Thread Randy Welch
Jack Coates wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 19:48, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote: Do not know. I am using acpi on my IBM 600X, which seems to work ok, except that I do not see any benefit over APM (bseides the fact that I can view temperatures and charge in

Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-21 Thread Jack Coates
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 19:48, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote: > > > Do not know. I am using acpi on my IBM 600X, which seems to work ok, > > except that I do not see any benefit over APM (bseides the fact that I can > > view temperatures and charge in mWh).

Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote: > Do not know. I am using acpi on my IBM 600X, which seems to work ok, > except that I do not see any benefit over APM (bseides the fact that I can > view temperatures and charge in mWh). Am I supposed to see my machine > suspend automatically (it d

Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-21 Thread Buchan Milne
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote: > I have been testing MDK on an HP Omnibook XE 4500. So far I have gotten the > ACPI stuff to work and the battery monitor applet runs good. However, I had > to manually insmod the ACPI modules. Is there a way to do that through a > GUI? W

[Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-21 Thread MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1)
Title: Message I have been testing MDK on an HP Omnibook XE 4500. So far I have gotten the ACPI stuff to work and the battery monitor applet runs good. However, I had to manually insmod the ACPI modules. Is there a way to do that through a GUI? What kinds of ACPI testing are you looking for?

Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 19:07, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote: > I have been testing MDK on an HP Omnibook XE 4500. So far I have > gotten the ACPI stuff to work and the battery monitor applet runs > good. However, I had to manually insmod the ACPI modules. Is there a > way to do that through a

[Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-20 Thread MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1)
Title: Message I have been testing MDK on an HP Omnibook XE 4500. So far I have gotten the ACPI stuff to work and the battery monitor applet runs good. However, I had to manually insmod the ACPI modules. Is there a way to do that through a GUI? What kinds of ACPI testing are you looking for?