BH> I'm not sure here. if you got everything it will include them as long as there
BH> are no issues.
I will run it again and log the output to a file. Maybe some useful
clue will come up.
Btw I changed 9.2.conf in the misc/doc/ dir. I have a feeling that it
is being used by default ?
BH> I think
On Monday 03 November 2003 01:53 pm, Galileo wrote:
> Don't care about lg also. My trusty old TEAC 40x is the best out there
>
> :)))
>
> btw how come I have only 1,3 gigs of iso ?
> Download edition is about 2 gigs large.
I'm not sure here. if you got everything it will include them as long as the
BH> if they are not then dont worry about it. In my case I run apache 2 so the
BH> above errors would not bother me at all.
Is there a way to force certain packages to for example first cd ?
>> 4 20:20 4-Cooker-download.iso drwxr-xr-x2 root root
>> Nov 4 20:18 Cooker-download/ [EMAIL PRO
On Monday 03 November 2003 11:26 am, Galileo wrote:
> BH> I dont use the conf files at all.
> It looks like simplicity is the best way :
>
> BH> then I copy the i586 tree myself. I add whatever i want onto my cd's
> from BH> contribs, plf, the club, texstar, updates, misc, and my own custom
> made
BH> I dont use the conf files at all.
It looks like simplicity is the best way :
BH> then I copy the i586 tree myself. I add whatever i want onto my cd's from
BH> contribs, plf, the club, texstar, updates, misc, and my own custom made
BH> rpm's. I then run makecd with just the path to my i586 dire
On Monday 03 November 2003 05:59 am, Galileo wrote:
> Would you be interested in writing a short howto for the rest of us
> who don't know how to do it ?
> I have been able to build a few isos on my own but I'm not really
> satisfied. I suppose that my main problem is that I don't understand
> conf
On Monday 03 November 2003 08:59 am, Galileo wrote:
> BH> well i have finished my own set and have made my own iso's but I don't
> think BH> that is what you mean. They are not fancy and still say cooker
> 9.2 when you BH> install them but they still pull updates from the 9.2
> tree. I would put up
BH> well i have finished my own set and have made my own iso's but I don't think
BH> that is what you mean. They are not fancy and still say cooker 9.2 when you
BH> install them but they still pull updates from the 9.2 tree. I would put up a
Would you be interested in writing a short howto for the
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 19:32, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> By the way Austin if you read this I have been playing with recording using
> audacity and it will get funny static kind of in the recordings if you don't
> use ext3. Any other journal file system will produce this although riser does
> it wor
On Sunday 02 November 2003 02:39 pm, Francisco Alcaraz wrote:
> Does anyone know when the 9.2 isos with the kernel problem
> solved will be avalaible?
>
> Regards
well i have finished my own set and have made my own iso's but I don't think
that is what you mean. They are not fancy and still say c
10 matches
Mail list logo