Re: [Cooker] Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"Thomas M. Beaudry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe I'm being naive here but... > Seeing as nobody but root should be able to change the installed kernel, > what's the problem with requiring it to be built by root? don't need to be build as root, unfortunately kernel do some mknod to create

RE: [Cooker] Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-23 Thread Thomas M. Beaudry
Maybe I'm being naive here but... Seeing as nobody but root should be able to change the installed kernel, what's the problem with requiring it to be built by root? > -Original Message- > > > I > > have also modified the kernel spec file to not require it be built as > > root (I hate tha

Re: [Cooker] Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-23 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have here, a kernel RPM spec file which includes the FreeS/WAN IPSec > code. I have it loaded on two boxes here and it seems to work fine. I > have also modified the kernel spec file to not require it be built as > root (I hate that! Talk abou

Re: [Cooker] Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-22 Thread Axalon Bloodstone
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > I have here, a kernel RPM spec file which includes the FreeS/WAN IPSec > code. I have it loaded on two boxes here and it seems to work fine. I > have also modified the kernel spec file to not require it be built as > root (I hate that! Talk about

[Cooker] Are we interested in IPSec (FreeS/WAN) in the kernel RPMs?

2000-01-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I have here, a kernel RPM spec file which includes the FreeS/WAN IPSec code. I have it loaded on two boxes here and it seems to work fine. I have also modified the kernel spec file to not require it be built as root (I hate that! Talk about trust!) I am hoping very much that Mandrake is intere