Re: lilo graphical screen (was Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug)

2001-09-05 Thread Grégoire Colbert
I repost... What about swapping the screens : - the internationalized "welcome" message goes to lilo screen - a Mandrakesoft logo goes into the kernel "framebuffer" picture (the one with the "welcomes"). Thus, you just say "Welcome", yet in many languages, you don't say "to Linux-Mandrake" in li

Re: lilo graphical screen (was Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug)

2001-09-05 Thread Grégoire Colbert
Dominik Bittl wrote: > > Frederic Bastok wrote: > >>On Wednesday 05 September 2001 10:12, François Pons wrote: >> >>>Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Grégoire Colbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >The question was more "Why is there something *written* on that screen >at all

Re: lilo graphical screen (was Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug)

2001-09-05 Thread Dominik Bittl
François Pons wrote: > > Dominik Bittl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Sorry, but what is it in english (fpitoun,fbastok )?? > > Because cooker is in english :-) > > François. That's it ! *g* mfg dominik -- "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have ev

Re: lilo graphical screen (was Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug)

2001-09-05 Thread François Pons
Dominik Bittl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry, but what is it in english (fpitoun,fbastok )?? Because cooker is in english :-) François.

Re: lilo graphical screen (was Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug)

2001-09-05 Thread Dominik Bittl
Frederic Bastok wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 September 2001 10:12, François Pons wrote: > > Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Grégoire Colbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The question was more "Why is there something *written* on that screen > > > > at all?". I think we could put a

Re: lilo graphical screen (was Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug)

2001-09-05 Thread Frederic Bastok
On Wednesday 05 September 2001 10:12, François Pons wrote: > Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Grégoire Colbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The question was more "Why is there something *written* on that screen > > > at all?". I think we could put a stylized MandrakeSoft logo? And after

Re: lilo graphical screen (was Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug)

2001-09-05 Thread François Pons
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Grégoire Colbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The question was more "Why is there something *written* on that screen at > > all?". I think we could put a stylized MandrakeSoft logo? And after all, > > that's quite stupid to write "Welcome to Linux-Mandrak

Re: lilo graphical screen (was Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug)

2001-09-04 Thread Dominik Bittl
Pixel wrote: > > Grégoire Colbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The question was more "Why is there something *written* on that screen at > > all?". I think we could put a stylized MandrakeSoft logo? And after all, > > that's quite stupid to write "Welcome to Linux-Mandrake" if you use lil

Re: lilo graphical screen (was Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug)

2001-09-04 Thread Pixel
Grégoire Colbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The question was more "Why is there something *written* on that screen at > all?". I think we could put a stylized MandrakeSoft logo? And after all, > that's quite stupid to write "Welcome to Linux-Mandrake" if you use lilo to > boot Windows... i ag

lilo graphical screen (was Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug)

2001-09-04 Thread Grégoire Colbert
Vox wrote: > During the bombing raid on Tue, 04 Sep 2001 13:38:45 +0200, Grégoire Colbert > was heard mumbling in fear: > >> What is criticizable is the "Welcome to Linux-Mandrake" in lilo screen, >> which is untranslated. Sorry for english people out there, but why >> should it be spelled in en

Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-04 Thread Peter Ruskin
On Tuesday 04 Sep 2001 02:56, Warly wrote: > Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Monday 03 Sep 2001 17:35, andre wrote: > > > Op 03 Sep 2001 22:59:44 +0200, Grégoire Colbert schreef: > >> > andre wrote: > >> > >> solved, then Aurora will be the first thing I will delete after > >> > >>

Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-04 Thread Vox
During the bombing raid on Tue, 04 Sep 2001 13:38:45 +0200, Grégoire Colbert was heard mumbling in fear: > Dominik Bittl wrote: > > After deactivation of Aurora, the ugly Welcome-Bootup-Screen with all the >different languages is still coming !! > > It is not ugly : it is called internation

RE: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-04 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
> After deactivation of Aurora, the ugly Welcome-Bootup-Screen with all the > different languages is still coming !! > > Or isn't that a part of Aurora ? > It is not part of Aurora and it is not ugly. Add nologo to kernel boot string. -andrej

Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-04 Thread Grégoire Colbert
Dominik Bittl wrote: > After deactivation of Aurora, the ugly Welcome-Bootup-Screen with all the different >languages is still coming !! It is not ugly : it is called internationalization. What is criticizable is the "Welcome to Linux-Mandrake" in lilo screen, which is untranslated. Sorry for

Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-04 Thread Dominik Bittl
After deactivation of Aurora, the ugly Welcome-Bootup-Screen with all the different languages is still coming !! Or isn't that a part of Aurora ? mfg dominik Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately Egil has gone back to his studies and does not weems to > take > > care anymore af A

RE: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-04 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
> > Unfortunately Egil has gone back to his studies and does not weems to take > care anymore af Aurora, at least for the moment, so I am the unlucky guys > who > take it as maintainer. > Good. > However, I'll try to fix most of the annoying stuff, so if you could > enumerate > all the Bad T

Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-03 Thread Warly
Peter Ruskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 03 Sep 2001 17:35, andre wrote: > > Op 03 Sep 2001 22:59:44 +0200, Grégoire Colbert schreef: >> > andre wrote: >> > >> solved, then Aurora will be the first thing I will delete after >> > >> upgrade to 8.1. ;) >> > > >> > > I see you are not th

Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-03 Thread Peter Ruskin
On Monday 03 Sep 2001 17:35, andre wrote: > Op 03 Sep 2001 22:59:44 +0200, Grégoire Colbert schreef: > > andre wrote: > > >> solved, then Aurora will be the first thing I will delete after > > >> upgrade to 8.1. ;) > > > > > > I see you are not the average cooker user. They don't delete it > > > *

Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-03 Thread andre
Op 03 Sep 2001 22:59:44 +0200, Grégoire Colbert schreef: > andre wrote: > > >> solved, then Aurora will be the first thing I will delete after > >> upgrade to 8.1. ;) > > > I see you are not the average cooker user. They don't delete it > > *after* an upgrade. > > I'm not running Cooker. :) >

Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-03 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
Le Lundi 3 Septembre 2001 22:50, andre scribit : > I see you are not the average cooker user. They don't delete it *after* > an upgrade. true. they don't install it or deinstall it before (first reflexe with the install of kdebase-nsplugins). -- Copyleft Faber's prod. 2001 http://perso.wanadoo.

Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-03 Thread Grégoire Colbert
andre wrote: >> solved, then Aurora will be the first thing I will delete after >> upgrade to 8.1. ;) > I see you are not the average cooker user. They don't delete it > *after* an upgrade. I'm not running Cooker. :) I wrote this because chances are Aurora be installed by default in 8.1...

Re: [Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-03 Thread andre
> > Hello, > > I experienced hardware problem with Mandrake 8.0, and when restarting > Linux, after HardDrake appeared, Aurora printed something like it could > not "open terminal" and garbage looking like "ANSI" codes in old MS-DOS > for colours. To see if this bug is solved in Cooker, just

[Cooker] Aurora bug

2001-09-03 Thread Grégoire Colbert
Hello, I experienced hardware problem with Mandrake 8.0, and when restarting Linux, after HardDrake appeared, Aurora printed something like it could not "open terminal" and garbage looking like "ANSI" codes in old MS-DOS for colours. To see if this bug is solved in Cooker, just unplug your mo