Re: [Cooker] Beta 3, 7.1 problems

2000-06-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Brook humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Finally thanks Pixel (again, not sure how many times). It was due to a > bad cdrom. I didn't even know how bad it was. Because it seemed to be When burning CD's, be careful. At high-speed (6x, 8x), this kind of things appear at install time with some

Re: [Cooker] Beta 3, 7.1 problems

2000-06-07 Thread Brook humphrey
Sorry for my implications. I'm learning new things all the time and cooker will definitely turn up bad parts faster than windows. For instance never ever get a gateway computer the ones that have built in video are not very friendly with linux. Finally thanks Pixel (again, not sure how many time

Re: [Cooker] Beta 3, 7.1 problems

2000-06-07 Thread Brook humphrey
Pixel thanks. I tried it. They all came up md5 ok accept for xemacs extras so I ran it again and the 2, and 3 time it came ok. After this I tried another install with a different hard drive but about half way through I started getting the same errors. This time it was on different rpm's though.

Re: [Cooker] Beta 3, 7.1 problems

2000-06-07 Thread Pixel
Brook humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) To many to count but about 1/4 of the rpms on the install cd are bad > or the hdlist is bad (just guessing here) but the installer was able to > detect that they were bad and even asked me if I wanted to continue. could you verify the md5sum of the

[Cooker] Beta 3, 7.1 problems

2000-06-07 Thread Brook humphrey
Sorry I haven't been contributing to much during the last beta testing but here goes. I have a newer gateway with rage 128 and soundblaster sound. promise ata-66, ibm hard drive, and a nic card. I'm not normally posting things like this Because I really like mandrake allot and I really like t