Re: [Cooker] Bug with G++ and 9.0

2003-04-01 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Pascal Terjan wrote: That means a return is missing. That's not an error so I guess there is a default value (maybe 0 or it is undefined, I don't know the norm) when return is missing. No, it returns current garbage.

[Cooker] Bug with G++ and 9.0

2003-03-31 Thread Josh Seidel
I am currently using Linux mandrake 9.0, with g++ --version: g++ (GCC) 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.0 3.2-1mdk) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. I have a source file that compiles, but there is a syntax error in the file. I also compiled with an older version of g++ (I think it was 2.1

Re: [Cooker] Bug with G++ and 9.0

2003-03-31 Thread Pascal Terjan
Josh Seidel wrote: I have a source file that compiles, but there is a syntax error in the file. I also compiled with an older version of g++ (I think it was 2.1 or 1.2, some obsolete version that is on a SunOS machine I don't have access to). In .NET (I do not own it, it is my professors computer)