Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 15:47 schrieb Buchan Milne:
> > Yep that is what i get since weeks now, but nobody seems to have
> > recognized that yet.
>
> I haven't had problems before, and this one just went through ...
Well i had a quick try remembering that the webservers have moved
recently.
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 15:45 schrieb Michael Scherer:
> On Wednesday 27 August 2003 14:38, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 13:58 schrieb Buchan Milne:
> > > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/&short_desc=Zenity%20emulation%20of%20
> > >gd ia log%20is%20broken...&keywords=&for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 13:58 schrieb Buchan Milne:
>
>>Götz Waschk wrote:
>>
>>>Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly:
>>>
>Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
fixed :)
>>>
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 13:58 schrieb Buchan Milne:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Götz Waschk wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly:
> >>>Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
> >>
> >>fixed :)
> >
> > It's not fixed for me:
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 14:38, Steffen Barszus wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 13:58 schrieb Buchan Milne:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Götz Waschk wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly:
> > >>>Gettting forbidden error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Götz Waschk wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly:
>
>>>Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
>>
>>fixed :)
>
> It's not fixed for me:
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4918
>
It's not possible to
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2003, 00:40:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Warly:
> > Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
> fixed :)
It's not fixed for me:
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4918
--
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans and the
homeless, whether the mad destruc
"MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
fixed :)
--
Warly
> Gettting forbidden error on qa.mandrakesoft.com
>
> Cory Meisch
> CPEA Test Technician
> HP deskjet linux team member
> Hewlett-Packard Vancouver
> (360) 212-7009
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Think that's strange then check out http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/wiki/
"This page is temporarily closed in prote
Is BugZilla down? I can't connect to qa.mandrakesoft.com but I can ping it.
Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> I might have to succumb to the irony of having to use a Windows-based browser
> to use Mandrake's bugzilla :p
Try with Opera 5, it seems to work :
http://www.opera.com
Grégoire
On Thursday 06 September 2001 9:32 pm, you wrote:
> Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Bugzilla (qa.mandrakesoft.com) seems to have been down for the past few
> > days - rather at an awkward moment, given that beta3 is imminent?
>
> try https
The problem is that
andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Op 06 Sep 2001 21:02:49 +0200, Chmouel Boudjnah schreef:
> > Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Any particular reason? I'm just kinda curious, as I've
> > > never heard of anyone saying not to do that before. Some
> > > kind of security issue I'm
Op 06 Sep 2001 21:02:49 +0200, Chmouel Boudjnah schreef:
> Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any particular reason? I'm just kinda curious, as I've
> > never heard of anyone saying not to do that before. Some
> > kind of security issue I'm not familiar with?
>
> they don't allow any r
Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any particular reason? I'm just kinda curious, as I've
> never heard of anyone saying not to do that before. Some
> kind of security issue I'm not familiar with?
they don't allow any request to a non crypted port from outside (that
stupid i know but i'm n
> > Bugzilla went live. Is it possible that the web admin
> > could add a simple redirect on
> > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/ that points to
>
> only a problem of our security people doen't allow us to do that :-(.
Any particular reason? I'm just kinda curious, as I've
never heard of anyone say
Don Head <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bugzilla went live. Is it possible that the web admin
> could add a simple redirect on
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/ that points to
only a problem of our security people doen't allow us to do that :-(.
On Thu Sep 06, 2001 at 12:41:20PM -0500, Don Head wrote:
> >> Bugzilla (qa.mandrakesoft.com) seems to have been down for
> >> the past few days
> >> - rather at an awkward moment, given that beta3 is imminent?
> >
> > try https
>
> I've noticed this has been a problem ever since Mdk's
> Bugzi
>> Bugzilla (qa.mandrakesoft.com) seems to have been down for
>> the past few days
>> - rather at an awkward moment, given that beta3 is imminent?
>
> try https
I've noticed this has been a problem ever since Mdk's
Bugzilla went live. Is it possible that the web admin
could add a simple redir
Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Bugzilla (qa.mandrakesoft.com) seems to have been down for the past few days
> - rather at an awkward moment, given that beta3 is imminent?
try https
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Hello,
Bugzilla (qa.mandrakesoft.com) seems to have been down for the past few days
- rather at an awkward moment, given that beta3 is imminent?
Wanted to check the progress on DrakNet; Internet Connection Sharing is very
buggy in 8.0 freq3, gabber refuses to start up too, complaining of a mis
21 matches
Mail list logo
