On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:17:37 +0200
Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> > On Friday 07 November 2003 04:42 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> > Yes, the initrd link was set up properly this time, although I have
> lost my
> > bootsplash with the .21 kernel. I am not sure if it is
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Friday 07 November 2003 04:42 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> > Greg Meyer wrote:
> > > For Danny and Buchan, I have been using your test rpms for ATI kernel
> >
> > modules
> >
> > > and Win4Lin together on my Thinkpad for about four hours now without any
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Friday 07 November 2003 04:42 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
>>win4lin packages are supposed to be updated in the 9.2 contrib tree ...
>>but I have had no response from Lenny ...
>>
>
> Shouldn't the win4lin packages from the original
On Friday 07 November 2003 04:42 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> > For Danny and Buchan, I have been using your test rpms for ATI kernel
>
> modules
>
> > and Win4Lin together on my Thinkpad for about four hours now without any
> > problems. Everything seems to be quite stable.
>
> w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote:
> For Danny and Buchan, I have been using your test rpms for ATI kernel
modules
> and Win4Lin together on my Thinkpad for about four hours now without any
> problems. Everything seems to be quite stable.
win4lin packages are suppose
For Danny and Buchan, I have been using your test rpms for ATI kernel modules
and Win4Lin together on my Thinkpad for about four hours now without any
problems. Everything seems to be quite stable.
--
/g
"Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read" -Gro
